From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#28413: 26.0.50; enable frame filters for gdb-mi Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2019 10:33:34 +0300 Message-ID: <83v9tbftf5.fsf@gnu.org> References: Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="173771"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: tom@tromey.com, 28413@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Kangas Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Sep 29 09:34:19 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iETij-000j4Z-Sq for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 29 Sep 2019 09:34:18 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37222 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iETii-0002JR-9M for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 29 Sep 2019 03:34:16 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:54900) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iETiV-0002J1-0x for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Sep 2019 03:34:05 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iETiT-00068i-Vn for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Sep 2019 03:34:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:43290) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iETiT-00067i-Rg for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Sep 2019 03:34:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iETiT-0004O2-MK for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Sep 2019 03:34:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2019 07:34:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 28413 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 28413-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B28413.156974242716842 (code B ref 28413); Sun, 29 Sep 2019 07:34:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 28413) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Sep 2019 07:33:47 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52111 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iETiF-0004Na-2a for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 29 Sep 2019 03:33:47 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:45799) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iETiD-0004NN-Fi for 28413@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 29 Sep 2019 03:33:45 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:45210) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iETi8-00052v-3r; Sun, 29 Sep 2019 03:33:40 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=3135 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1iETi7-0005PV-GQ; Sun, 29 Sep 2019 03:33:39 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Stefan Kangas on Sun, 29 Sep 2019 03:17:38 +0200) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:167611 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Kangas > Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2019 03:17:38 +0200 > Cc: Tom Tromey , 28413@debbugs.gnu.org > > >> I noticed that gdb-mi doesn't enable frame filters. > >> > >> I think it shouldn't hurt to simply always enable them, as in the > >> attached patch. > > > > Looks reasonable, thanks. > > This patch was never installed at the time. Should it be installed? Yes. I believe I expected Tom to install it.