From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#37826: Very annoying autoraise client/server behavior with -t option Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2019 13:22:53 +0300 Message-ID: <83v9si2y9u.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83tv84540m.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="144374"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: 37826@debbugs.gnu.org To: Carlos Pita Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Oct 21 12:24:12 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iMUrD-000bNJ-FC for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 12:24:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37252 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iMUrB-0001ay-S0 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 06:24:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:42184) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iMUr5-0001ae-Kx for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 06:24:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iMUr4-00084P-Na for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 06:24:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:46942) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iMUr4-00084J-Kf for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 06:24:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iMUr4-0005T7-Fe for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 06:24:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2019 10:24:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 37826 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 37826-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B37826.157165338620952 (code B ref 37826); Mon, 21 Oct 2019 10:24:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 37826) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Oct 2019 10:23:06 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55763 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iMUqA-0005Rs-Cw for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 06:23:06 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:33047) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iMUq8-0005RB-Lb for 37826@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 06:23:04 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:34685) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iMUq3-0007tq-Hz; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 06:22:59 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=2058 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1iMUq2-0003RQ-Ty; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 06:22:59 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Carlos Pita on Mon, 21 Oct 2019 05:58:13 -0300) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:169895 Archived-At: > From: Carlos Pita > Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2019 05:58:13 -0300 > Cc: 37826@debbugs.gnu.org > > Here is a patch that narrows the scope of minibuffer-auto-raise to > write/revert actions that require user intervention. I don't think I agree with such narrowing of the scope, certainly not as an unconditional default behavior. There are definitely situations where an informational message in the echo-area needs to attract the user's attention. I also think your proposal would have an un-proportionally large effect, whereas the original problem is quite minor. Is it possible to have a solution that only affects this particular use case? E.g., can we delay the message until the new frame is created? Thanks.