From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#40728: 27.0.91; Removed public functions from debugger.el Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2020 09:32:20 +0300 Message-ID: <83v9lk2k97.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83imhugoyq.fsf@gnu.org> <87h7x4zm2k.fsf@runbox.com> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="54642"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: p.stephani2@gmail.com, 40728@debbugs.gnu.org To: Gemini Lasswell Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Apr 28 08:37:22 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jTJrt-000E7Q-OC for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 08:37:21 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43328 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jTJrs-0002cj-NJ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 02:37:20 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:36030) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jTJqC-0000en-1Y for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 02:37:11 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jTJni-0001FU-Lv for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 02:35:35 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:55348) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jTJni-0001FP-9q for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 02:33:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jTJni-0004qy-6Z for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 02:33:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2020 06:33:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 40728 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 40728-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B40728.158805557018632 (code B ref 40728); Tue, 28 Apr 2020 06:33:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 40728) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Apr 2020 06:32:50 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38661 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jTJnW-0004qR-5L for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 02:32:50 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:32792) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jTJnV-0004qB-0S for 40728@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 02:32:49 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:52499) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jTJnP-0001E7-C1; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 02:32:43 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=4500 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1jTJnN-0005Je-88; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 02:32:42 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87h7x4zm2k.fsf@runbox.com> (message from Gemini Lasswell on Mon, 27 Apr 2020 13:54:27 -0700) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:179198 Archived-At: > From: Gemini Lasswell > Cc: Philipp Stephani , 40728@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2020 13:54:27 -0700 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > Gemini, could you please write replacements for the functions you > > removed, or defalias them to some equivalent replacements? I agree > > that public functions should not be removed, not without deprecating > > them first (if indeed they don't make sense). > > Here is a patch to bring those functions back. Thanks! Philipp, any comments? If not, I'd like to install this on the release branch.