From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#36779: 25.1; mouse click not recognized for frames with large left position Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2020 12:45:19 +0300 Message-ID: <83v9h41ky8.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87h87c2hhg.fsf@LAPTOP-0TO7HGG8.localdomain> <8336ivpkt5.fsf@gnu.org> <83o91inuse.fsf@gnu.org> <6b7c63b2-9b69-6955-1e4b-82b86c088da6@gmx.at> <73bd973f-b526-df1c-fe46-0d879362fb7e@gmx.at> <83r25prviq.fsf@gnu.org> <17dccaed-e83e-44d7-49bc-8af169dc87d7@gmx.at> <838se23pjo.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="7924"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: sumii@ecei.tohoku.ac.jp, 36779@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Kangas Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Aug 27 11:48:30 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kBEWD-0001wY-NN for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 11:48:29 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33540 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kBEWC-0005pj-Pp for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 05:48:28 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:33338) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kBETq-0004r5-CR for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 05:46:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:58330) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kBETp-0006Ar-S5 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 05:46:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kBETp-00042i-Qn for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 05:46:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2020 09:46:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 36779 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 36779-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B36779.159852155415523 (code B ref 36779); Thu, 27 Aug 2020 09:46:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 36779) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Aug 2020 09:45:54 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41643 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kBETb-00042D-0t for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 05:45:53 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:51406) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kBETZ-000420-Qd for 36779@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 05:45:46 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:49306) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kBETR-00062J-V7; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 05:45:38 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=3299 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kBETM-0007eV-55; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 05:45:37 -0400 In-Reply-To: (message from Stefan Kangas on Thu, 27 Aug 2020 02:36:47 -0700) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:186516 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Kangas > Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2020 02:36:47 -0700 > Cc: rudalics@gmx.at, sumii@ecei.tohoku.ac.jp, 36779@debbugs.gnu.org > > I've pushed the attached patch to master as commit 2fd9860481. Thanks. > Should this bug be left open? What else is left to do here?