From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#21380: 25.0.50; GTK-induced segfault when scheduling timer from window-configuration-change-hook Date: Mon, 07 Sep 2020 22:09:31 +0300 Message-ID: <83v9gpmmj8.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83mvx8252m.fsf@gnu.org> <83k2sc20k6.fsf@gnu.org> <83h9ng1ryx.fsf@gnu.org> <83a8t71qct.fsf@gnu.org> <837foaceid.fsf@gnu.org> <83vbbuawgy.fsf@gnu.org> <875z8p5xdl.fsf@gnus.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="10876"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 21380@debbugs.gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, pipcet@gmail.com To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Sep 07 21:10:09 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kFMWn-0002j0-D8 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 07 Sep 2020 21:10:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33994 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kFMWm-0002Bj-FA for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 07 Sep 2020 15:10:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:51272) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kFMWg-0002BQ-As for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Sep 2020 15:10:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:39338) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kFMWg-0001jY-10 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Sep 2020 15:10:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kFMWf-0005Ap-Rx for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Sep 2020 15:10:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 07 Sep 2020 19:10:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 21380 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 21380-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B21380.159950578319862 (code B ref 21380); Mon, 07 Sep 2020 19:10:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 21380) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Sep 2020 19:09:43 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50884 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kFMWM-0005AH-MT for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 07 Sep 2020 15:09:42 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:41110) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kFMWL-0005A4-98 for 21380@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 07 Sep 2020 15:09:41 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:47887) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kFMWF-0001er-JA; Mon, 07 Sep 2020 15:09:35 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=1725 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kFMWF-00060u-0k; Mon, 07 Sep 2020 15:09:35 -0400 In-Reply-To: <875z8p5xdl.fsf@gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Mon, 07 Sep 2020 19:07:18 +0200) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:187472 Archived-At: > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , 21380@debbugs.gnu.org, Stefan Monnier > > Date: Mon, 07 Sep 2020 19:07:18 +0200 > > In any case, the timer_check change seems safe, and fixes a (somewhat > obscure) segfault, so does anybody object to putting that in? Which part? There was more than one patch in the discussion.