From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#45068: [PATCH] 28.0.50; Update Modus themes 1.0.2 (backward-incompatible) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2020 16:32:42 +0200 Message-ID: <83v9d81khh.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87im9fgm27.fsf@protesilaos.com> <87zh2ozer4.fsf@tcd.ie> <87ft4edret.fsf@protesilaos.com> <87zh2ldgtf.fsf@protesilaos.com> <87k0toof83.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <83wnxo1mcr.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="21705"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: contovob@tcd.ie, info@protesilaos.com, 45068@debbugs.gnu.org, juri@linkov.net To: Stefan Kangas Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Dec 11 15:34:29 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1knjV6-0005Xb-T8 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 11 Dec 2020 15:34:28 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58376 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1knjV5-0004Vf-Sb for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 11 Dec 2020 09:34:27 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:41318) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1knjUh-0004Uj-5C for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Dec 2020 09:34:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:57382) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1knjUg-0004EN-TA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Dec 2020 09:34:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1knjUg-0006CE-Q0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Dec 2020 09:34:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2020 14:34:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 45068 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 45068-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B45068.160769719123749 (code B ref 45068); Fri, 11 Dec 2020 14:34:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 45068) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Dec 2020 14:33:11 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40694 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1knjTq-0006Ay-Lk for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 11 Dec 2020 09:33:11 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:47862) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1knjTo-0006AZ-2o for 45068@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 11 Dec 2020 09:33:09 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:46852) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1knjTh-0003ri-94; Fri, 11 Dec 2020 09:33:01 -0500 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=2318 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1knjTg-0006YA-1U; Fri, 11 Dec 2020 09:33:00 -0500 In-Reply-To: (message from Stefan Kangas on Fri, 11 Dec 2020 08:16:47 -0600) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:195759 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Kangas > Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2020 08:16:47 -0600 > Cc: juri@linkov.net, info@protesilaos.com, contovob@tcd.ie, > 45068@debbugs.gnu.org > > Right. Well, I don't exactly have a strong opinion either way. But I > do think that we should be consistent: it would be confusing to have > some themes in "etc/themes" and some in "lisp/themes". Why not have all of them in etc/themes? > If we can't move all themes to "lisp/themes" and we don't want to use > "lisp/themes" just for support files, to my mind the only remaining way > forward is to add some way to byte-compile (perhaps only some?) files in > "etc/themes". What theme-related files need to be byte-compiled, and why?