From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#47067: 28.0.50; [feature/native-comp] Crash while scrolling through dispnew.c Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2021 22:07:12 +0200 Message-ID: <83v99uhl73.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83sg52lykn.fsf@gnu.org> <83mtv8lrmf.fsf@gnu.org> <83czw4lelg.fsf@gnu.org> <835z1wl6ao.fsf@gnu.org> <831rckl56k.fsf@gnu.org> <83o8fojgqy.fsf@gnu.org> <83lfarjzof.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="21721"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 47067@debbugs.gnu.org To: Andrea Corallo Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Mar 13 21:16:00 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lLAg4-0005Xv-J7 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 13 Mar 2021 21:16:00 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51830 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lLAg3-0005WY-JG for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 13 Mar 2021 15:15:59 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:59714) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lLAYM-0005mW-AB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Mar 2021 15:08:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:49182) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lLAYM-0006WS-18 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Mar 2021 15:08:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lLAYL-0006oo-SM for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Mar 2021 15:08:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2021 20:08:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 47067 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 47067-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B47067.161566603526154 (code B ref 47067); Sat, 13 Mar 2021 20:08:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 47067) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Mar 2021 20:07:15 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60728 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lLAXa-0006nm-Ml for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 13 Mar 2021 15:07:14 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:41770) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lLAXX-0006nY-VS for 47067@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 13 Mar 2021 15:07:12 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:41450) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lLAXS-0006A5-QO; Sat, 13 Mar 2021 15:07:06 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:1034 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1lLAXS-0003U6-2x; Sat, 13 Mar 2021 15:07:06 -0500 In-Reply-To: (message from Andrea Corallo on Sat, 13 Mar 2021 19:51:59 +0000) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:202299 Archived-At: > From: Andrea Corallo > Cc: 47067@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2021 19:51:59 +0000 > > I've done nothing special, I've just a regular wide-int 32bit build on > the virtual machine I've prepared, running interactivelly Emacs underg > gdb is unusable for the reason I've described (outside gdb it works > perfectly). I think it has nothing to do with native compilation. Maybe your GDB has problems with debugging 32-bit executables? > > Meanwhile, could you please post the backtrace I asked for from the > > 64-bit build? Maybe it will tell me enough to get some ideas. > > Here it is: Very different. I don't understand why all those functions you see appear as ?? in my case. Maybe it indeed has something to do with ELF vs PE-COFF binaries. I'm just guessing.