From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#45198: 28.0.50; Sandbox mode Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2021 18:57:37 +0300 Message-ID: <83v98kvr7y.fsf@gnu.org> References: <5818DFAA-3A9C-4335-BAAF-1227A02C290A@acm.org> <19511709-E42B-4ABD-9823-39EA08A79B1F@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="11706"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: alan@idiocy.org, mattiase@acm.org, 45198@debbugs.gnu.org, stefankangas@gmail.com, joaotavora@gmail.com, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca To: Philipp Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Apr 17 17:58:15 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lXnKo-0002uR-7u for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 17 Apr 2021 17:58:14 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49114 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lXnKn-0001Rn-6b for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 17 Apr 2021 11:58:13 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:51184) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lXnKc-0001RS-KG for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Apr 2021 11:58:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:60876) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lXnKc-0002o3-Cp for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Apr 2021 11:58:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lXnKc-0003nZ-A5 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Apr 2021 11:58:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2021 15:58:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 45198 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 45198-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B45198.161867507714589 (code B ref 45198); Sat, 17 Apr 2021 15:58:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 45198) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Apr 2021 15:57:57 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44189 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lXnKW-0003nE-NT for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 17 Apr 2021 11:57:56 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:38542) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lXnKV-0003n2-7w for 45198@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 17 Apr 2021 11:57:55 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:35480) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lXnKO-0002jU-He; Sat, 17 Apr 2021 11:57:48 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:1862 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1lXnKM-00009G-Jc; Sat, 17 Apr 2021 11:57:48 -0400 In-Reply-To: <19511709-E42B-4ABD-9823-39EA08A79B1F@gmail.com> (message from Philipp on Sat, 17 Apr 2021 17:44:06 +0200) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:204221 Archived-At: > From: Philipp > Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2021 17:44:06 +0200 > Cc: João Távora , > 45198@debbugs.gnu.org, Stefan Kangas , > Stefan Monnier , Alan Third > > > It works and can be pushed right away but it would be nice to have a place to use it, for validation and for tuning the interface. Any plans for that? > > > > I think it would be better to first implement the mechanism and not the high-level `sandbox-enter' function (I think that one needs a bit more discussion), and implement the mechanism as a command-line flag. IMO, if we have no reasonably clear idea how this will be used on the high level, it might make sense to move this to a feature branch, instead of working on master. That's because without a high-level view, there's no way people could try implementing the same functionality on platforms other than GNU/Linux, let alone use it. So from my POV, at this point this is just an experiment, and we have feature branches for that.