From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#48042: 26.3; Macros don't work with french-postfix input method Date: Fri, 14 May 2021 17:36:00 +0300 Message-ID: <83v97lxu0f.fsf@gnu.org> References: <86pmyghqf1.fsf@upmc.fr> <425cd7715bc9fae8b39a@heytings.org> <831ra9zi4x.fsf@gnu.org> <425cd7715bda5353110e@heytings.org> <83y2chxvg4.fsf@gnu.org> <425cd7715b4c15a15813@heytings.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="23762"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, harven@free.fr, 48042@debbugs.gnu.org To: Gregory Heytings Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri May 14 16:37:24 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lhYwN-00062E-AC for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 14 May 2021 16:37:23 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45190 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lhYwM-0000zI-Bu for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 14 May 2021 10:37:22 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:57234) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lhYw2-0000uJ-Es for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 14 May 2021 10:37:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:35212) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lhYw2-00015z-6R for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 14 May 2021 10:37:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lhYw2-0008I2-3D for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 14 May 2021 10:37:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 14 May 2021 14:37:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 48042 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: confirmed Original-Received: via spool by 48042-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B48042.162100297631809 (code B ref 48042); Fri, 14 May 2021 14:37:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 48042) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 May 2021 14:36:16 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46757 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lhYvH-0008Gy-SX for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 14 May 2021 10:36:16 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:35146) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lhYvE-0008Gi-IV for 48042@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 14 May 2021 10:36:15 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:53134) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lhYv8-0000Ob-8I; Fri, 14 May 2021 10:36:06 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:2274 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lhYv7-0005cA-RI; Fri, 14 May 2021 10:36:06 -0400 In-Reply-To: <425cd7715b4c15a15813@heytings.org> (message from Gregory Heytings on Fri, 14 May 2021 14:16:26 +0000) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:206525 Archived-At: > Date: Fri, 14 May 2021 14:16:26 +0000 > From: Gregory Heytings > cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, harven@free.fr, 48042@debbugs.gnu.org > > What do you expect me to do now? If you are asking how I'd like to proceed with this bug, then, as I wrote in another message, I'd like us to have a full understanding of why binding inhibit--record-char didn't work well enough in the case in point. It did solve some of the problem we had before that change, but didn't solve all of it -- why? Once we understand that, I think we will have a much better basis for discussing the possible solutions.