From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#49194: kill-whole-line 'plus-newline-even-if-none-in-reality Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2021 21:42:56 +0300 Message-ID: <83v963rtn3.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87tuloegsa.5.fsf@jidanni.org> <87lf6zi6nq.fsf@gnus.org> <87sg17p2jd.5.fsf@jidanni.org> <87mtrff7ao.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="30740"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 49194@debbugs.gnu.org, jidanni@jidanni.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Jun 24 20:44:35 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lwUL5-0007q4-Le for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 24 Jun 2021 20:44:35 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43442 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lwUL4-0006Pf-7K for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 24 Jun 2021 14:44:34 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:60390) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lwUKY-0006Md-Nx for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Jun 2021 14:44:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:60822) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lwUKY-0007br-0V for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Jun 2021 14:44:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lwUKX-0000jj-Vh for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Jun 2021 14:44:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2021 18:44:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 49194 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo Original-Received: via spool by 49194-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B49194.16245601952746 (code B ref 49194); Thu, 24 Jun 2021 18:44:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 49194) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Jun 2021 18:43:15 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44135 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lwUJn-0000iE-D7 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 24 Jun 2021 14:43:15 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:34262) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lwUJl-0000hz-I6 for 49194@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 24 Jun 2021 14:43:14 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:53156) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lwUJg-0007C2-5l; Thu, 24 Jun 2021 14:43:08 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:1203 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lwUJf-0003NO-Ut; Thu, 24 Jun 2021 14:43:08 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87mtrff7ao.fsf@gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Thu, 24 Jun 2021 20:26:23 +0200) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:208962 Archived-At: > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2021 20:26:23 +0200 > Cc: 49194@debbugs.gnu.org > > 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson writes: > > > No. I'm just saying that a bonus newline should be added to what gets > > copied (so later, upon C-y, it is present.) > > I think that sounds like really surprising behaviour, but I guess if > it's hidden behind a new `kill-whole-line' value, I guess I don't have > any objections to adding it. Any other opinions? AFAIU, what the OP wants already happens: the newline is saved in kill-ring together with the line, and is yanked back with C-y. So I don't think I understand the request.