From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#49731: 28.0.50; Filter xref results by filename Date: Sat, 31 Jul 2021 20:06:58 +0300 Message-ID: <83v94qo1jh.fsf@gnu.org> References: <030dbe6c-130d-e578-f50d-54e90bfa7cfa@yandex.ru> <7593e0f3-9399-ccf3-21de-b2ac79ae3730@yandex.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="22756"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: dgutov@yandex.ru, 49731@debbugs.gnu.org To: Daniel =?UTF-8?Q?Mart=C3=ADn?= Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Jul 31 19:08:10 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1m9sT3-0005jB-RZ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 31 Jul 2021 19:08:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40558 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1m9sT2-0005kS-Gq for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 31 Jul 2021 13:08:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:33120) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1m9sSw-0005kJ-Mz for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 31 Jul 2021 13:08:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:51448) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1m9sSw-0004JN-Fi for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 31 Jul 2021 13:08:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m9sSw-000868-5H for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 31 Jul 2021 13:08:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 31 Jul 2021 17:08:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 49731 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 49731-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B49731.162775124031077 (code B ref 49731); Sat, 31 Jul 2021 17:08:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 49731) by debbugs.gnu.org; 31 Jul 2021 17:07:20 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34761 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m9sSG-00085A-JC for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 31 Jul 2021 13:07:20 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:35252) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m9sSF-00084y-A6 for 49731@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 31 Jul 2021 13:07:19 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:53786) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1m9sS9-0003o3-Eb; Sat, 31 Jul 2021 13:07:13 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:1251 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1m9sS9-0004h0-0X; Sat, 31 Jul 2021 13:07:13 -0400 In-Reply-To: (bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:211010 Archived-At: > Cc: 49731@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Sat, 31 Jul 2021 18:45:35 +0200 > From: Daniel Martín via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, > the Swiss army knife of text editors" > > Dmitry Gutov writes: > > > > > But do we want it to be implemented using outline-mode? Because we > > want the corresponding visuals? Because otherwise a dedicated > > implementation shouldn't take much more code either (probably roughly > > the size of xref-truncation-width feature we added recently). > > > > Yes, I think implementing the feature using outline-mode is not a good > idea. How about using selective-display?