From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#50731: `progress-reporter-update' docstring and `backward-sexp' interaction Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2021 09:16:52 +0300 Message-ID: <83v92rvmsr.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83k0j9vz63.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="39595"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 50731@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Kangas Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Sep 23 08:18:24 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mTI3s-000A82-4i for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 23 Sep 2021 08:18:24 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36720 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mTI3q-0003Ra-8V for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 23 Sep 2021 02:18:22 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:37676) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mTI3Z-0003RQ-Gv for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Sep 2021 02:18:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:40940) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mTI3W-0007dt-58 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Sep 2021 02:18:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mTI3W-0007AZ-0o for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Sep 2021 02:18:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2021 06:18:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 50731 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 50731-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B50731.163237783227493 (code B ref 50731); Thu, 23 Sep 2021 06:18:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 50731) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Sep 2021 06:17:12 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52485 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mTI2h-00079L-TI for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 23 Sep 2021 02:17:12 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:48660) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mTI2U-00078d-Rc for 50731@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 23 Sep 2021 02:17:11 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:34542) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mTI2O-0006a1-E0; Thu, 23 Sep 2021 02:16:52 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:1038 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mTI2O-0008Ro-1G; Thu, 23 Sep 2021 02:16:52 -0400 In-Reply-To: (message from Stefan Kangas on Wed, 22 Sep 2021 15:12:51 -0700) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:215162 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Kangas > Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2021 15:12:51 -0700 > Cc: 50731@debbugs.gnu.org > > >From my point of view, the first thing to do is to decide is if this > `backward-sexp' behavior is a bug or not. How do we decide? What is TRT for backward-sexp in context that has no sexps? If we change anything here, it could potentially affect a lot of unrelated code out there. Once again, why does checkdoc want you to have 2 spaces there? what rule is it that ends up requiring that?