From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#51523: 29.0.50; gnus-mime-view-part-externally very slow Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2021 19:15:34 +0200 Message-ID: <83v91blrux.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87v91dmcyz.fsf@gnus.org> <7b7f5641fcf9629c6074@heytings.org> <875ytcwxp7.fsf@gnus.org> <6abcac838b0dd46d94cf@heytings.org> <87sfwgvi73.fsf@gnus.org> <6abcac838bc0f53a0f78@heytings.org> <6abcac838bb83b0904d7@heytings.org> <6abcac838b7f89ee4e21@heytings.org> <831r3zncow.fsf@gnu.org> <6abcac838b521de77925@heytings.org> <83zgqnlt7t.fsf@gnu.org> <87y267revf.fsf@gnus.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="39819"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 51523@debbugs.gnu.org, gregory@heytings.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Nov 01 18:17:28 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mhaw2-000A4x-Nn for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 01 Nov 2021 18:17:26 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40390 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mhaw0-0007cu-4x for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 01 Nov 2021 13:17:25 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:55140) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mhaug-0005bS-9f for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Nov 2021 13:16:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:52679) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mhaug-0006px-07 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Nov 2021 13:16:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mhauf-0000Q6-Ro for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Nov 2021 13:16:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2021 17:16:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 51523 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo Original-Received: via spool by 51523-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B51523.16357869561601 (code B ref 51523); Mon, 01 Nov 2021 17:16:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 51523) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Nov 2021 17:15:56 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35992 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mhauZ-0000Pl-Pe for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 01 Nov 2021 13:15:56 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:57708) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mhauX-0000PW-Un for 51523@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 01 Nov 2021 13:15:54 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:36570) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mhauS-0006mI-Ne; Mon, 01 Nov 2021 13:15:48 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=l+e2ZN9u07Jp9mHoaqRyQBe1B/zAAG2S3E7zxFeY07o=; b=VvLrsfIJaJsk rwEi8oKxMxgjVFGoYcm02WCzlALay+1n0ykkDoqTqLL+yt1vzKI4YiD3pid+Rwi90NfRlJOj2RBCT Cekh5E4H9cbYweyoUCshSAY/qW++kz9swbRs9tU+LbepDiIm//ppSEwMgzEEo+0kB8x7nF4jV4DFc IyrOBkHf7LgEHzc/5ZgcvaJlEmyXqXZrCU9ro9FWJFpTF6f6pfW/bkS0jiP5Ad8i/oskWhy1MoM91 WnjEKMVmCVMEv7axBWTD/QONWgYtmwjxynRUSs6et3TGqR0xsAzxo9ZVLlRXsFzuk4KbicDnR6BEc X5xM6cPwNBuxCbIhFaVoUg==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=1132 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mhauL-0006Sm-F2; Mon, 01 Nov 2021 13:15:47 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87y267revf.fsf@gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Mon, 01 Nov 2021 17:59:32 +0100) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:218774 Archived-At: > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Cc: Gregory Heytings , 51523@debbugs.gnu.org, > monnier@iro.umontreal.ca > Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2021 17:59:32 +0100 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > What would be the purpose of replacing with an older file, but keeping > > the old time stamp? > > That's the interface I want. If the file changes, in any noticeable > way, then it... changes. Newer or not has nothing to do with it. But the real answer to that question is to compare the contents, not file's attributes. Testing attributes is an approximation, and once we are using an approximation, it is legitimate to ask when it's okay for the approximation to fail. Basically, comparing time stamps is what Make does, and Make doesn't care about the time stamp becoming older. So why should we? And if by "I want" you mean Gnus, then maybe we should name this function gnus-has-mailcap-file-changed-p, and stop pretending that it has more general use?