From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#52063: 28.0.60; Confusing presentation of lambda Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2021 15:15:47 +0200 Message-ID: <83v90h8zjw.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83czmqaegb.fsf@gnu.org> <874k82vwe5.fsf@gnus.org> <831r35afde.fsf@gnu.org> <87v90hu36b.fsf@gnus.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="7933"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 52063@debbugs.gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 24 14:52:35 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mpshN-0001kG-P9 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 24 Nov 2021 14:52:34 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49684 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mpshM-0005Dg-QO for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 24 Nov 2021 08:52:32 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:42480) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mps90-0000Vw-IU for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Nov 2021 08:17:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:41941) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mps90-0006aj-7B for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Nov 2021 08:17:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mps90-0007cN-0D for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Nov 2021 08:17:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2021 13:17:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 52063 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 52063-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B52063.163775976229192 (code B ref 52063); Wed, 24 Nov 2021 13:17:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 52063) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Nov 2021 13:16:02 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53486 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mps81-0007aa-P3 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 24 Nov 2021 08:16:02 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:41376) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mps7y-0007aD-1r for 52063@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 24 Nov 2021 08:16:00 -0500 Original-Received: from [2001:470:142:3::e] (port=57790 helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mps7o-0006Ho-SM; Wed, 24 Nov 2021 08:15:50 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=feFLW3wHOGZFaq4kdzWdUkdqlz2CvG0P4MUDLmhCxVI=; b=P+ereBOzylSI 9lNN9Cymj9qs7dCh8iaIzQdpOlVUPK4D9dXNX+htZtNFcK2NUBQU3VH4SFb3VO8NEtYHBMX811G3d TZSOAs7DFqMh2yqxm3hEr8yDGElBxmTrlv+K06C/t1FpjsEpGqjmu++rhKi/fSzWgJUok1Hq2Y8PZ mnrF7lFXqMjVDU9mo2JyoR7TYvOlIsmw+Hxw8Xdas1JEzlytsGLXsOaOCCgh8ppC2onWVjBWPC6A4 5loXwKR9jtvKp2PnSu9bbPAW64OHiDbyTUgWLvQzZBZvhKLD2JJltR+kKrK29o96ok5rlg+xwPy4m TxA5ZAjo5Ajzn2uSDSbBkw==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=3759 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mps7o-0008Tw-I6; Wed, 24 Nov 2021 08:15:48 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87v90hu36b.fsf@gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Wed, 24 Nov 2021 13:51:56 +0100) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:220735 Archived-At: > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Cc: 52063@debbugs.gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca > Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2021 13:51:56 +0100 > > > What I want to see is my lambda, the one I put in the hook. > > But you put a closure on your hook, not the lambda. > > (lambda () 1) > => (closure (t) nil 1) Where do you see something like the above in my recipe? The recipe was: (add-hook 'mail-mode-hook #'(lambda () (setq flyspell-generic-check-word-p 'mail-mode-flyspell-verify))) AFAIU, this adds a function to the hook. And the function is not a constant 1, it has some code. And please bear with me, I'm NOT teasing Emacs. I'm REALLY confused here. It's a good-faith bug report about confusion. I added an anonymous function to the hook, but Emacs says I added a closure. WTF? Btw, this comes from my ~/.emacs, so the problem is not limited to evaluation in *scratch*.