From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#9087: Crash reading from minibuffer with icomplete-mode Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2011 06:01:27 +0300 Message-ID: <83tyak70mw.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83zkkfhk4c.fsf@gnu.org> <83wrfjhgml.fsf@gnu.org> <83tyanh8j0.fsf@gnu.org> <83pql9mwne.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1310958146 31825 80.91.229.12 (18 Jul 2011 03:02:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2011 03:02:26 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 9087@debbugs.gnu.org To: Juanma Barranquero Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jul 18 05:02:22 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qie68-00034b-HU for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 18 Jul 2011 05:02:20 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42555 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qie67-00009o-CO for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 17 Jul 2011 23:02:19 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:41762) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qie5r-00009R-8F for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Jul 2011 23:02:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qie5q-0000UJ-FR for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Jul 2011 23:02:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:35139) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qie5q-0000UF-9i for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Jul 2011 23:02:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qie5p-0005SP-Nn; Sun, 17 Jul 2011 23:02:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2011 03:02:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 9087 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 9087-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B9087.131095810920958 (code B ref 9087); Mon, 18 Jul 2011 03:02:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 9087) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Jul 2011 03:01:49 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qie5d-0005Rz-95 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 17 Jul 2011 23:01:49 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qie5a-0005Rl-Ai for 9087@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 17 Jul 2011 23:01:47 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LOI00700DM1D000@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for 9087@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 18 Jul 2011 06:01:27 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.229.133.66]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LOI007A8DQECW30@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Mon, 18 Jul 2011 06:01:27 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2011 23:02:01 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:49376 Archived-At: > From: Juanma Barranquero > Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2011 04:07:50 +0200 > Cc: 9087@debbugs.gnu.org > > On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 05:08, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > Wasn't the crash inside UNBLOCK_INPUT? > > Wouldn't this > > --interrupt_input_blocked; > > have triggered the interrupt_input_blocked watchpoint? It should have. But if the abort was not in UNBLOCK_INPUT, then I don't understand the backtrace you posted: where else is the call to `abort', if not inside UNBLOCK_INPUT?