From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#9990: valgrind warning in add_row_entry Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2011 22:35:54 +0200 Message-ID: <83ty6egxn9.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83k47ailf0.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1320784754 1332 80.91.229.12 (8 Nov 2011 20:39:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2011 20:39:14 +0000 (UTC) Cc: dann@gnu.org, 9990@debbugs.gnu.org To: Andreas Schwab Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Nov 08 21:39:10 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RNsRm-0008HF-Ek for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 08 Nov 2011 21:39:06 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60883 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RNsRl-0005U5-VD for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 08 Nov 2011 15:39:05 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:59958) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RNsRi-0005Tp-Sx for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Nov 2011 15:39:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RNsRh-0007MN-Sb for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Nov 2011 15:39:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:40627) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RNsRh-0007MJ-R5 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Nov 2011 15:39:01 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RNsRi-0005ns-CO for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Nov 2011 15:39:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2011 20:39:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 9990 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 9990-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B9990.132078472722287 (code B ref 9990); Tue, 08 Nov 2011 20:39:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 9990) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Nov 2011 20:38:47 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RNsRT-0005nQ-7r for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 08 Nov 2011 15:38:47 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RNsRR-0005nB-0F for 9990@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 08 Nov 2011 15:38:46 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LUC00A00ZWVQH00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for 9990@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 08 Nov 2011 22:37:55 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.228.42.212]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LUC0072SZZ6Z711@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Tue, 08 Nov 2011 22:37:55 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2011 15:39:02 -0500 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:53720 Archived-At: > From: Andreas Schwab > Cc: Dan Nicolaescu , 9990@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2011 19:44:28 +0100 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > Does valgrind know that row_table_size is initially zero because it is > > static? > > valgrind does not know anything about variables, only about memory > locations. It operates at the machine language level. Does that mean valgrind can potentially flag as uninitialized every static variable that isn't explicitly initialized at run time? Because AFAIK static variables are initialized by the linker (is that right?).