From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#10057: 24.0.91; doc string of `Info-find-file' Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 20:10:14 +0200 Message-ID: <83ty64c515.fsf@gnu.org> References: <8B7B45455BDC4BFBAC6E24B36D21695F@us.oracle.com> <7DCB4AC13F2B4BA19A9BBB34E78086CA@us.oracle.com> <5C41898136234BBFA995CBC4D05B7108@us.oracle.com> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1321467213 32038 80.91.229.12 (16 Nov 2011 18:13:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 18:13:33 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 10057@debbugs.gnu.org To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 16 19:13:29 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RQjzF-0002wQ-Kl for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 19:13:29 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43584 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RQjzF-0004OT-3M for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 13:13:29 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:51382) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RQjz7-0004O7-72 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 13:13:26 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RQjz1-0004mx-Ml for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 13:13:21 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:52016) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RQjz1-0004ms-Jb for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 13:13:15 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RQjzl-0001Jm-Hd for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 13:14:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 18:14:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10057 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 10057-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10057.13214671824984 (code B ref 10057); Wed, 16 Nov 2011 18:14:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 10057) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Nov 2011 18:13:02 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RQjyo-0001IJ-9V for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 13:13:02 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout23.012.net.il ([80.179.55.175]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RQjyl-0001Hm-17 for 10057@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 13:13:00 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout23.012.net.il by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LUR00E00MEYLW00@a-mtaout23.012.net.il> for 10057@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 20:12:06 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.124.184.15]) by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LUR00EM1MK5BJB0@a-mtaout23.012.net.il>; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 20:12:06 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 13:14:01 -0500 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:53992 Archived-At: > From: "Drew Adams" > Cc: , <10057@debbugs.gnu.org> > Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 06:52:29 -0800 > > > > Apparently, we should not bother to point out when > > > parameters to functions etc. are undefined/undescribed. > > > > No. "We" should of course report such potential omissions, > > Not according to Stefan's "general rule": According to that, omission indicates > clearly to everyone that that the behavior is unpredictable and unsupported. That's a misrepresentation of what Stefan said. But you already know that. > > instead of raising the level of flames and continuing the argument. > > It was not I who made a mountain out of this tiny molehill [...] I rest my case.