From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#16828: 24.3.50; eval-expression, character representation of integer results time-consuming Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2014 15:11:05 +0200 Message-ID: <83txbr2sye.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83mwhk4v48.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1393074671 16563 80.91.229.3 (22 Feb 2014 13:11:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2014 13:11:11 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 16828@debbugs.gnu.org To: Anders Lindgren Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Feb 22 14:11:18 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WHCMP-0001dC-Qx for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 22 Feb 2014 14:11:17 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49534 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WHCMP-0001HP-9m for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 22 Feb 2014 08:11:17 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34219) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WHCMG-0001GD-Ga for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Feb 2014 08:11:14 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WHCMA-0006KG-Mf for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Feb 2014 08:11:08 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:34289) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WHCMA-0006KB-J1 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Feb 2014 08:11:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WHCMA-0004F6-Bl for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Feb 2014 08:11:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2014 13:11:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 16828 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 16828-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B16828.139307465416290 (code B ref 16828); Sat, 22 Feb 2014 13:11:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 16828) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Feb 2014 13:10:54 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35471 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WHCM1-0004Ea-SL for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 22 Feb 2014 08:10:54 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout28.012.net.il ([80.179.55.184]:46995) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WHCLz-0004EB-80 for 16828@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 22 Feb 2014 08:10:52 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout28.012.net.il by mtaout28.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0N1E00N00F09DE00@mtaout28.012.net.il> for 16828@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 22 Feb 2014 15:11:20 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by mtaout28.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0N1E00JD9FAW6350@mtaout28.012.net.il>; Sat, 22 Feb 2014 15:11:20 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:86022 Archived-At: > Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2014 13:49:24 +0100 > From: Anders Lindgren > Cc: "16828@debbugs.gnu.org" <16828@debbugs.gnu.org> > > Personally, I see little value of always seeing the char representation of > integers >255, and if that comes at the cost of a 22 second delay I don't > see that it's worth it. A user option should be a good compromise (we could argue about its default value later ;-).