From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#17411: 24.4.50; emacs_backtrace.txt Date: Mon, 12 May 2014 21:33:06 +0300 Message-ID: <83tx8uq23h.fsf@gnu.org> References: <4ed285be-ccc5-4df6-90f8-5dfd88f52d21@default> <83siofu3gf.fsf@gnu.org> <83ppjjt9mw.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1399919675 2119 80.91.229.3 (12 May 2014 18:34:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 12 May 2014 18:34:35 +0000 (UTC) Cc: lekktu@gmail.com, 17411@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon May 12 20:34:28 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Wjv3R-0001Ho-3f for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 12 May 2014 20:34:25 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39306 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wjv3Q-0000jH-EV for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 12 May 2014 14:34:24 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54095) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wjv3G-0000hx-JK for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 12 May 2014 14:34:21 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wjv34-0003EB-UR for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 12 May 2014 14:34:14 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:43694) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wjv34-0003E4-S0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 12 May 2014 14:34:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Wjv34-0005IW-IT for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 12 May 2014 14:34:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 12 May 2014 18:34:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 17411 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo Original-Received: via spool by 17411-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B17411.139991960420301 (code B ref 17411); Mon, 12 May 2014 18:34:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 17411) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 May 2014 18:33:24 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:32812 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Wjv2R-0005HN-PL for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 12 May 2014 14:33:23 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout29.012.net.il ([80.179.55.185]:52831) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Wjv2Q-0005H4-Ab for 17411@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 12 May 2014 14:33:23 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout29.012.net.il by mtaout29.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0N5H00E004S1L900@mtaout29.012.net.il> for 17411@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 12 May 2014 21:34:15 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by mtaout29.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0N5H005V14X2TJ80@mtaout29.012.net.il>; Mon, 12 May 2014 21:34:14 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:88984 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Monnier > Cc: lekktu@gmail.com, 17411@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Mon, 12 May 2014 14:18:36 -0400 > > > So I think the only practical way of obtaining this information is to > > add eassert's that will tell you which one is it. > > But I don't know what to add where, at this point. Maybe I misunderstood. You said: > It might also be interesting to look at `i' to see whether it's > hopelessly messed up, or if it looks "incorrect but sanish". So I thought about an eassert that will catch something "hopelessly messed up", for example.