From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#17497: 24.4.50; TTY menu glitches Date: Fri, 16 May 2014 18:26:10 +0300 Message-ID: <83tx8peodp.fsf@gnu.org> References: <5374B271.50803@yandex.ru> <83zjijlz83.fsf@gnu.org> <5375DD9E.9030608@yandex.ru> <83zjiidms5.fsf@gnu.org> <537627EE.6040309@yandex.ru> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1400254045 579 80.91.229.3 (16 May 2014 15:27:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 16 May 2014 15:27:25 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 17497@debbugs.gnu.org To: Dmitry Antipov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri May 16 17:27:18 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WlK2X-0002SD-L2 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 16 May 2014 17:27:17 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36320 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WlK2X-0002Qa-7e for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 16 May 2014 11:27:17 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54693) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WlK2P-0002PJ-9Y for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 16 May 2014 11:27:14 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WlK2J-0004ou-5J for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 16 May 2014 11:27:09 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:44394) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WlK2J-0004oQ-2V for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 16 May 2014 11:27:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WlK2I-00050b-E9 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 16 May 2014 11:27:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 16 May 2014 15:27:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 17497 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 17497-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B17497.140025397919178 (code B ref 17497); Fri, 16 May 2014 15:27:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 17497) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 May 2014 15:26:19 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37458 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WlK1a-0004zG-PG for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 16 May 2014 11:26:19 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout26.012.net.il ([80.179.55.182]:58283) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WlK1Y-0004yr-1K for 17497@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 16 May 2014 11:26:17 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout26.012.net.il by mtaout26.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0N5O00L00ANBUQ00@mtaout26.012.net.il> for 17497@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 16 May 2014 18:23:04 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by mtaout26.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0N5O00CVUAQGIJ80@mtaout26.012.net.il>; Fri, 16 May 2014 18:23:04 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: <537627EE.6040309@yandex.ru> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:89165 Archived-At: > Date: Fri, 16 May 2014 18:59:58 +0400 > From: Dmitry Antipov > CC: 17497@debbugs.gnu.org > > On 05/16/2014 02:46 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > Does the change below help in any way? > > Unfortunately no, AFAICS. If you record in a termscript while doing what it takes to reproduce the problem, and the dump that termscript to the screen, do you see the same artifacts as you saw in Emacs?