From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#18652: 25.0.50; [PATCH] Add fresh-line Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2014 09:46:56 +0300 Message-ID: <83tx3divtr.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83zjd7jawz.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1412837246 16492 80.91.229.3 (9 Oct 2014 06:47:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2014 06:47:26 +0000 (UTC) Cc: sdl.web@gmail.com, 18652@debbugs.gnu.org To: Glenn Morris Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Oct 09 08:47:18 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Xc7VN-0003c5-Mc for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 09 Oct 2014 08:47:17 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40783 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xc7VN-00031G-Cu for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 09 Oct 2014 02:47:17 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44496) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xc7VE-000313-KB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Oct 2014 02:47:14 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xc7V8-0003OT-O6 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Oct 2014 02:47:08 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:46878) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xc7V8-0003OP-Lq for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Oct 2014 02:47:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Xc7V8-0002uG-75 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Oct 2014 02:47:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2014 06:47:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 18652 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 18652-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B18652.141283720811148 (code B ref 18652); Thu, 09 Oct 2014 06:47:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 18652) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Oct 2014 06:46:48 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38442 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Xc7Ut-0002tk-4i for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 09 Oct 2014 02:46:47 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:45958) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Xc7Up-0002tZ-O2 for 18652@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 09 Oct 2014 02:46:45 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0ND500600ZBGVS00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for 18652@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 09 Oct 2014 09:46:41 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0ND6006PY05TND50@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Thu, 09 Oct 2014 09:46:41 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:94323 > From: Glenn Morris > Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2014 22:02:23 -0400 > Cc: 18652@debbugs.gnu.org > > Leo Liu wrote: > > > Thanks for the reminder. I just added it. BTW, is there criteria on what > > goes in NEWS? > > My criterion is "if in doubt, add an entry". My criteria are: (a) any change in behavior that is not a bugfix or any new functionality, and (b) if in doubt, add an entry.