From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#21092: 25.0.50; Option `lazy-highlight-max-at-a-time' does not work Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2015 19:03:45 +0300 Message-ID: <83twrj2ye6.fsf@gnu.org> References: <56e13714-27a7-47f9-93df-299b4a25457d@default> <83wpwf2z6m.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1440777865 5096 80.91.229.3 (28 Aug 2015 16:04:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2015 16:04:25 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 21092@debbugs.gnu.org To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Aug 28 18:04:14 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZVM8S-00060z-V9 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 28 Aug 2015 18:04:13 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48720 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZVM8S-0000sE-9n for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 28 Aug 2015 12:04:12 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40382) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZVM8O-0000rg-EE for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Aug 2015 12:04:09 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZVM8I-0001Ru-Qv for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Aug 2015 12:04:08 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:49391) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZVM8I-0001Rq-Ne for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Aug 2015 12:04:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZVM8I-0004e9-7m for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Aug 2015 12:04:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2015 16:04:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 21092 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 21092-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B21092.144077782617840 (code B ref 21092); Fri, 28 Aug 2015 16:04:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 21092) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Aug 2015 16:03:46 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41601 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZVM81-0004dg-Vh for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 28 Aug 2015 12:03:46 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout28.012.net.il ([80.179.55.184]:32973) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZVM7z-0004dX-QG for 21092@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 28 Aug 2015 12:03:44 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout28.012.net.il by mtaout28.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NTS00N00V68C400@mtaout28.012.net.il> for 21092@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 28 Aug 2015 19:03:34 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.94.185.246]) by mtaout28.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NTS00B5KV9Y43E0@mtaout28.012.net.il>; Fri, 28 Aug 2015 19:03:34 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:105923 Archived-At: > Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2015 08:59:34 -0700 (PDT) > From: Drew Adams > Cc: 21092@debbugs.gnu.org > > I am interested in the general question of whether the > display engine precludes highlighting more than what is "on screen". You can, of course, put the overlays or properties with some face on the entire buffer. So no, the display engine doesn't preclude that.