From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#24790: Segmentation fault when changing default font on master Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 22:42:54 +0300 Message-ID: <83twc0use9.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83d1iowf95.fsf@gnu.org> <5a23afdb-f7d0-c983-7b25-206bd5a80017@live.com> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1477424785 30235 195.159.176.226 (25 Oct 2016 19:46:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 19:46:25 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 24790@debbugs.gnu.org To: =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Pit--Claudel Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 25 21:46:21 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bz7fb-0004sf-VW for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 21:46:00 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57853 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bz7fe-0007ld-BI for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 15:46:02 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56763) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bz7dl-0006Rw-4o for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 15:44:05 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bz7di-0002oJ-Hs for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 15:44:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:41336) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bz7di-0002oE-FM for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 15:44:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bz7di-000836-8u for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 15:44:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 19:44:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 24790 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 24790-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B24790.147742459930881 (code B ref 24790); Tue, 25 Oct 2016 19:44:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 24790) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Oct 2016 19:43:19 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56735 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bz7d0-000820-UE for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 15:43:19 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:37100) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bz7cy-00081o-TL for 24790@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 15:43:17 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bz7cs-0002U2-Tk for 24790@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 15:43:11 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:49906) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bz7cs-0002Ty-QK; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 15:43:10 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:1644 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1bz7co-0001ly-Dp; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 15:43:10 -0400 In-reply-to: <5a23afdb-f7d0-c983-7b25-206bd5a80017@live.com> (message from =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Pit--Claudel on Tue, 25 Oct 2016 15:27:45 -0400) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:125016 Archived-At: > Cc: 24790@debbugs.gnu.org > From: Clément Pit--Claudel > Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 15:27:45 -0400 > > >> My Emacs has patch af1a69f4d17a482c359d98c00ef86fac835b5fac reverted. Could this make a difference? > > > > With such a simple reproducer, it's much easier to re-apply the patch > > and see if it makes the difference than answer your question by just > > looking at your data. > > Indeed, and it seems that my reversing this patch is what caused the issue (IOW, I can't crash Emacs any more after re-applying the patch). So this report can be closed? > > Why do you still have that commit reverted, btw? I thought the > > problem caused by it is nowadays solved: you have a variable to avoid > > it. > > I never heard about that variable :) Which one is it? inhibit-compacting-font-caches, see NEWS on the emacs-25 branch.