From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#38007: scroll-lock binding on Windows Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2019 08:17:24 +0200 Message-ID: <83tv7om87f.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83zhhgn60i.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="81814"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: 38007@debbugs.gnu.org To: Juanma Barranquero Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Nov 01 07:18:11 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iQQGB-000LBU-C8 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 01 Nov 2019 07:18:11 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56682 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iQQG9-0007MY-Et for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 01 Nov 2019 02:18:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:33656) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iQQG3-0007MG-JI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Nov 2019 02:18:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iQQG2-0000Nf-Ny for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Nov 2019 02:18:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:46116) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iQQG2-0000NZ-Ko for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Nov 2019 02:18:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iQQG2-0002Ci-F9 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Nov 2019 02:18:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2019 06:18:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 38007 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 38007-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B38007.15725890488426 (code B ref 38007); Fri, 01 Nov 2019 06:18:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 38007) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Nov 2019 06:17:28 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54937 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iQQFT-0002Bq-RS for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 01 Nov 2019 02:17:28 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:52776) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iQQFS-0002Bd-4L for 38007@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 01 Nov 2019 02:17:26 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:40371) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iQQFN-0008LE-1N; Fri, 01 Nov 2019 02:17:21 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=4103 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1iQQFM-0007eo-GH; Fri, 01 Nov 2019 02:17:20 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Juanma Barranquero on Thu, 31 Oct 2019 23:59:45 +0100) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:170575 Archived-At: > From: Juanma Barranquero > Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2019 23:59:45 +0100 > Cc: 38007@debbugs.gnu.org > > OK. I see three ways: > > - Something like this in bindings.el: > > (define-key global-map (if (eq system-type 'windows-nt) [scroll] [Scroll_Lock]) 'scroll-lock-mode) > > - Leave bindings.el as is and rebind the command to [scroll] in lisp/term/w32-win.el, > > - Or use some of the translation keymaps to translate [scroll] into [Scroll_Lock]. > > Which one makes more sense? I don't know yet, because I don't see where does Scroll_Lock come on Posix platforms. Can someone tell what did I miss?