From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#38183: 26.3; Doc about equality of markers Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2019 19:35:28 +0200 Message-ID: <83tv7511r3.fsf@gnu.org> References: <<104e3572-fe9c-42b8-a099-769389ff1588@default>> <<83eey92s7m.fsf@gnu.org>> Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="174764"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: 38183@debbugs.gnu.org To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Nov 15 18:49:18 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iVfif-000jJy-Lg for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 18:49:17 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43394 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iVfid-0008UW-SD for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 12:49:15 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:38759) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iVfVv-0000wP-Es for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 12:36:10 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iVfVr-0001i6-W6 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 12:36:06 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:56754) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iVfVq-0001gM-KX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 12:36:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iVfVq-0002dl-Bg for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 12:36:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2019 17:36:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 38183 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 38183-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B38183.157383935310134 (code B ref 38183); Fri, 15 Nov 2019 17:36:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 38183) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Nov 2019 17:35:53 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37342 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iVfVh-0002dO-5m for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 12:35:53 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:57809) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iVfVe-0002d4-G0 for 38183@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 12:35:52 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:34362) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iVfVX-000194-QQ; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 12:35:45 -0500 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=2598 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1iVfVW-0006oq-Sh; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 12:35:43 -0500 In-reply-to: (message from Drew Adams on Fri, 15 Nov 2019 09:26:45 -0800 (PST)) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:171681 Archived-At: > Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2019 09:26:45 -0800 (PST) > From: Drew Adams > Cc: 38183@debbugs.gnu.org > > > > I think the doc about equality of markers should be improved. > > > > I don't understand what are the practical problems caused by the > > current text in the manual. It seems the information you were after > > is present, so it isn't clear what exactly is the problem here. > > > > It seems that the only problem you have is the place where the details > > of 'equal' for markers are described? > > I think the bug report is pretty clear, detailed, and > specific. But to provide a quick summary response: No need, I've read the original report. It sounds like you missed the "practical" part of my questions above. If you just disagree with where the information is now, then we can agree to disagree. > Please consider putting all of the info in the section > about markers, mentioning the different equality tests: > `eq', `equal', and `='. I don't think this is needed. The current text has all the info, and the place where we have that is fine with me.