From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#38384: (next|previous)-buffer silent about not switching Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2019 22:07:35 +0200 Message-ID: <83tv6qqu48.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83lfs2sky2.fsf@gnu.org> <83a78isee4.fsf@gnu.org> <8336eascjk.fsf@gnu.org> <83y2w2qvj5.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="188726"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: 38384@debbugs.gnu.org To: Juanma Barranquero Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Nov 26 21:08:10 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iZh85-000mvi-Gz for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 26 Nov 2019 21:08:09 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58690 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iZh84-0007J2-Bo for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 26 Nov 2019 15:08:08 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:40570) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iZh7y-0007Ik-Tv for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Nov 2019 15:08:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iZh7x-0003n6-Ua for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Nov 2019 15:08:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:47046) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iZh7x-0003n2-RX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Nov 2019 15:08:01 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iZh7x-0001H3-NF for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Nov 2019 15:08:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2019 20:08:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 38384 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 38384-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B38384.15747988594869 (code B ref 38384); Tue, 26 Nov 2019 20:08:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 38384) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Nov 2019 20:07:39 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53019 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iZh7a-0001GT-QU for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 26 Nov 2019 15:07:39 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:59671) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iZh7Z-0001GH-7x for 38384@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 26 Nov 2019 15:07:37 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:35720) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iZh7U-0003Ya-4E; Tue, 26 Nov 2019 15:07:32 -0500 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=1547 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1iZh7R-0007tG-AN; Tue, 26 Nov 2019 15:07:29 -0500 In-reply-to: (message from Juanma Barranquero on Tue, 26 Nov 2019 20:56:42 +0100) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:172480 Archived-At: > From: Juanma Barranquero > Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2019 20:56:42 +0100 > Cc: 38384@debbugs.gnu.org > > > We previously signaled user-error in situations where we couldn't > > continue at all. Your addition is in a situation where nothing > > particularly bad happened, so from the POV of a caller, we are now > > signaling a user-error gratuitously. I'm bothered only by the change > > whereby we signal a user-error with the purpose of attracting the > > user's attention, not because we cannot continue. > > I don't really see much difference. Well, I do. > Anyway, there's no point in arguing this; if you feel strongly that the last case should depend on > called-interactively-p, I'll change it. Please do, and thanks.