From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#44180: 28.0.50; Emacs frames won't redisplay unless resized Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2020 11:36:58 +0300 Message-ID: <83tuukggut.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87wnzgkdsj.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <83k0vgiyub.fsf@gnu.org> <87k0vgkbgq.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <83eeloivgc.fsf@gnu.org> <87lffw1wjv.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <7f32498b-1293-f1ee-5636-8ddd5bbff6c1@gmx.at> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="15891"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: eric@ericabrahamsen.net, 44180@debbugs.gnu.org To: martin rudalics , "J. Scott Berg" Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Oct 24 10:38:09 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kWF3x-00041e-KU for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 24 Oct 2020 10:38:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39250 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kWF3w-0000XG-3P for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 24 Oct 2020 04:38:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:32938) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kWF3q-0000Wm-CF for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Oct 2020 04:38:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:47401) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kWF3q-0004gV-2Y for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Oct 2020 04:38:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kWF3p-0000DQ-U3 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Oct 2020 04:38:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2020 08:38:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 44180 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 44180-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B44180.1603528644779 (code B ref 44180); Sat, 24 Oct 2020 08:38:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 44180) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Oct 2020 08:37:24 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58947 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kWF3E-0000CV-12 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 24 Oct 2020 04:37:24 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:60992) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kWF39-0000CB-DW for 44180@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 24 Oct 2020 04:37:22 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:44176) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kWF32-0004Kb-PT; Sat, 24 Oct 2020 04:37:12 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=2938 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kWF32-0000TC-6U; Sat, 24 Oct 2020 04:37:12 -0400 In-Reply-To: <7f32498b-1293-f1ee-5636-8ddd5bbff6c1@gmx.at> (message from martin rudalics on Sat, 24 Oct 2020 08:55:48 +0200) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:191412 Archived-At: > Cc: 44180@debbugs.gnu.org > From: martin rudalics > Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2020 08:55:48 +0200 > > >> And if you revert that change, does the problem go away? > > > > Yes it does! > > Maybe we need an option for 2c0cd90083. Maybe we also should just > wait. I'd expect a few more of such reports to drop in. (Adding J. Scott to the addressees.) What about ignoring these events only if the size is 1x1, which is definitely bogus? Would that work in the VcXsrv case?