From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#41852: 27.0.50; text-scale commands don't scale header of tabulated-list-mode Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2020 10:29:48 +0200 Message-ID: <83tuuahk77.fsf@gnu.org> References: <955fe4fe-a64d-b7c6-fe31-7efd810f97a5@ims.co.at> <83mu553e0x.fsf@gnu.org> <953c6df9-59b4-8b57-0be3-600d147fe9c7@ims.co.at> <83y2k2pabb.fsf@gnu.org> <83wnzmnioj.fsf@gnu.org> <83lfg1nfv1.fsf@gnu.org> <83d01dnegn.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="31563"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: thomas.hisch@ims.co.at, 41852@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Kangas Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Oct 31 09:31:10 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kYmI2-000880-Ah for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 31 Oct 2020 09:31:10 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35420 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kYmI1-0004hz-Cr for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 31 Oct 2020 04:31:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:35820) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kYmHu-0004hf-FR for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 31 Oct 2020 04:31:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:48960) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kYmHu-0006oK-4P for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 31 Oct 2020 04:31:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kYmHt-0003pw-VG for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 31 Oct 2020 04:31:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2020 08:31:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 41852 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 41852-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B41852.160413301714694 (code B ref 41852); Sat, 31 Oct 2020 08:31:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 41852) by debbugs.gnu.org; 31 Oct 2020 08:30:17 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60506 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kYmHB-0003ow-4u for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 31 Oct 2020 04:30:17 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:35598) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kYmH8-0003od-PE for 41852@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 31 Oct 2020 04:30:15 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:35533) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kYmH1-0006NI-HO; Sat, 31 Oct 2020 04:30:07 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=2081 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kYmGx-0004bp-SJ; Sat, 31 Oct 2020 04:30:04 -0400 In-Reply-To: (message from Stefan Kangas on Thu, 29 Oct 2020 10:33:05 -0700) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:192252 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Kangas > Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2020 10:33:05 -0700 > Cc: thomas.hisch@ims.co.at, 41852@debbugs.gnu.org > > >> > Yes. Except that now I'm asking whether we need to obsolete the > >> > variable. is that just because of the name? > >> > >> I guess we could re-use the old name if we really want to. But it would > >> still be a breaking change, since this is now a list instead of a single > >> value. > > > > That's also easy to handle in a compatible way, right? > > OK, here's what I propose. I still suggest to make the old name into an > obsolete alias in order to mark it as internal, please let me know if > this is acceptable. I don't understand: I was asking to keep the variable and not make it obsolete, but this patch does make it obsolete anyway. What did I miss?