From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#44068: 28.0.50; Faulty uses of tabulated-list-format Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2020 19:12:16 +0200 Message-ID: <83tuu7d6of.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87imb7e242.fsf@gmx.net> <83zh4ipbli.fsf@gnu.org> <877drm13j3.fsf@gmx.net> <831rhuoy36.fsf@gnu.org> <87y2k2yqqb.fsf@gmx.net> <87h7qori97.fsf@gmx.net> <874kmcfy2h.fsf@rub.de> <875z6rmlrj.fsf@rub.de> <87r1pcu155.fsf@rub.de> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="30748"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: stefankangas@gmail.com, 44068@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stephen Berman Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Nov 02 18:21:48 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kZdWe-0007r4-7i for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 02 Nov 2020 18:21:48 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49334 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kZdWd-00085L-9W for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 02 Nov 2020 12:21:47 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:54468) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kZdOA-0004Ip-E5 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Nov 2020 12:13:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:59141) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kZdOA-0006oO-32 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Nov 2020 12:13:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kZdO9-0001Zl-VA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Nov 2020 12:13:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2020 17:13:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 44068 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 44068-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B44068.16043371596024 (code B ref 44068); Mon, 02 Nov 2020 17:13:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 44068) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Nov 2020 17:12:39 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42453 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kZdNn-0001Z6-9J for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 02 Nov 2020 12:12:39 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:54322) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kZdNl-0001Ys-6c for 44068@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 02 Nov 2020 12:12:37 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:50495) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kZdNf-0006m5-Nm; Mon, 02 Nov 2020 12:12:31 -0500 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=3164 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kZdNZ-0008WQ-IW; Mon, 02 Nov 2020 12:12:27 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87r1pcu155.fsf@rub.de> (message from Stephen Berman on Mon, 02 Nov 2020 00:07:34 +0100) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:192554 Archived-At: > From: Stephen Berman > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , 44068@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2020 00:07:34 +0100 > > > What you have here is already a big improvement, thank you. > > > > I would recommend to push this to master. > > Thanks. Eli, is that ok with you? Any reason I might not be okay with it? (I cannot say I've read every message in this thread to the last word.)