From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#45557: 27.1; Incorrect rendering of COMBINING OVERLINE Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2021 18:10:29 +0200 Message-ID: <83turu11xm.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87pn2rmmun.fsf@cam.ac.uk> <20210106.080803.2277569991627697271.enometh@meer.net> <83k0sq2j9m.fsf@gnu.org> <20210106.213051.1927113775620623865.enometh@meer.net> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="27648"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 45557@debbugs.gnu.org To: Madhu Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Jan 06 17:11:17 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kxBP2-000759-AD for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 06 Jan 2021 17:11:16 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33974 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kxBP1-0003hG-5p for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 06 Jan 2021 11:11:15 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:48870) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kxBOo-0003gU-Bb for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Jan 2021 11:11:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:33786) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kxBOn-0005if-T1 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Jan 2021 11:11:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kxBOn-0002TI-Np for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Jan 2021 11:11:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2021 16:11:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 45557 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: notabug Original-Received: via spool by 45557-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B45557.16099494379458 (code B ref 45557); Wed, 06 Jan 2021 16:11:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 45557) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Jan 2021 16:10:37 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45332 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kxBOO-0002SU-Ms for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 06 Jan 2021 11:10:36 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:55580) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kxBON-0002SJ-QS for 45557@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 06 Jan 2021 11:10:36 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:35412) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kxBOI-0005Ko-DD; Wed, 06 Jan 2021 11:10:30 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:3070 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kxBOH-0002js-Oy; Wed, 06 Jan 2021 11:10:30 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20210106.213051.1927113775620623865.enometh@meer.net> (message from Madhu on Wed, 06 Jan 2021 21:30:51 +0530 (IST)) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:197430 Archived-At: > Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2021 21:30:51 +0530 (IST) > Cc: 45557@debbugs.gnu.org > From: Madhu > > > Anyway, I see no Emacs problems in your description, only font > > problems. The text you sent is displayed correctly on my system, both > > of its lines. > > I assume the mswindows and applemac systems dont pull in harfbuzz? No, the Windows build does use HarfBuzz.