From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#45705: [feature/native-comp] Excessive memory consumption on windows 10 Date: Fri, 08 Jan 2021 18:10:00 +0200 Message-ID: <83turrif53.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87y2h5hjve.fsf@gmail.com> <831revjyja.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="32349"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: edouard.debry@gmail.com, 45705@debbugs.gnu.org To: Andrea Corallo Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Jan 08 17:11:10 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kxuM1-0008Ij-P1 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 08 Jan 2021 17:11:09 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43980 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kxuM0-0004nS-RH for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 08 Jan 2021 11:11:08 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:57042) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kxuLu-0004ma-Pg for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Jan 2021 11:11:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:38863) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kxuLu-0007Qh-EX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Jan 2021 11:11:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kxuLu-0003EL-9z for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Jan 2021 11:11:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 08 Jan 2021 16:11:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 45705 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 45705-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B45705.161012220512303 (code B ref 45705); Fri, 08 Jan 2021 16:11:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 45705) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Jan 2021 16:10:05 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50394 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kxuKz-0003CN-Cx for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 08 Jan 2021 11:10:05 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:35170) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kxuKx-0003Bn-Q0 for 45705@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 08 Jan 2021 11:10:04 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:39308) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kxuKs-0006th-By; Fri, 08 Jan 2021 11:09:58 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:4158 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kxuKr-00048v-IH; Fri, 08 Jan 2021 11:09:58 -0500 In-Reply-To: (message from Andrea Corallo on Fri, 08 Jan 2021 15:50:28 +0000) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:197524 Archived-At: > From: Andrea Corallo > Cc: edouard.debry@gmail.com, 45705@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Fri, 08 Jan 2021 15:50:28 +0000 > > consumptions of few GiB is something I've seen more then once for long > standing sessions. You might be right in this being a memory leak, > indeed I've no prove of that (I think we have none for the other > direction either). I'm not yet worried about memory leaks, I'm more worried that there's no memory leaks, and instead using libgccjit indeed requires such large memory amounts. Are you sure this is not the case?