From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#46627: [External] : bug#46627: [PATCH] Add new help command 'describe-command' Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2021 20:43:48 +0200 Message-ID: <83tuq7290b.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87tuq8ryk6.fsf@gnus.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="22130"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: larsi@gnus.org, stefan@marxist.se, 46627@debbugs.gnu.org To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 19 19:44:37 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lDAlY-0005fP-Ed for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 19:44:36 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39126 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lDAlX-0006jN-3D for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 13:44:35 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:34790) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lDAl0-0006bl-Lw for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 13:44:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:38829) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lDAl0-0006wT-CW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 13:44:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lDAl0-00035e-Au for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 13:44:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2021 18:44:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 46627 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 46627-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B46627.161376022311829 (code B ref 46627); Fri, 19 Feb 2021 18:44:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 46627) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Feb 2021 18:43:43 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50369 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lDAkh-00034j-4X for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 13:43:43 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:44982) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lDAkd-00034U-29 for 46627@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 13:43:42 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:55819) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lDAkX-0006oi-6W; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 13:43:33 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:1082 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1lDAkV-0003Cf-J2; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 13:43:32 -0500 In-Reply-To: (message from Drew Adams on Fri, 19 Feb 2021 18:27:05 +0000) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:200375 Archived-At: > From: Drew Adams > Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2021 18:27:05 +0000 > Cc: "46627@debbugs.gnu.org" <46627@debbugs.gnu.org> > > I bind it to `C-h c', in place of `describe-key-briefly', > which I moved to `C-h C-c'. > > I think this makes sense for vanilla Emacs also No, we will NOT move the "C-h c" binding, not on my watch. Please drop this idea. > as `d-k-b' is, I think, not used so much nowadays. (Am I wrong > about that? Dunno.) Yes, you are wrong. I use it all the time.