From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#49160: 28.0.50; [PATCH] Uninitialized inhibit_buffer_hooks Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2021 19:47:27 +0300 Message-ID: <83tukq5jz4.fsf@gnu.org> References: <874kdratxt.fsf@dick> <83fsxaunxe.fsf@gnu.org> <87a6mijmrb.fsf@gnus.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="31144"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 49160@debbugs.gnu.org, dick.r.chiang@gmail.com To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Jul 19 18:48:16 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1m5WRD-0007ud-7x for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 19 Jul 2021 18:48:15 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45906 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1m5WRC-00022d-9o for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 19 Jul 2021 12:48:14 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:36206) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1m5WR0-0001xG-4k for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Jul 2021 12:48:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:48599) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1m5WQz-0002WQ-T7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Jul 2021 12:48:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m5WQz-0007d9-K4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Jul 2021 12:48:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2021 16:48:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 49160 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 49160-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B49160.162671326229306 (code B ref 49160); Mon, 19 Jul 2021 16:48:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 49160) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Jul 2021 16:47:42 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60145 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m5WQg-0007ca-09 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 19 Jul 2021 12:47:42 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:38330) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m5WQd-0007cN-Mm for 49160@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 19 Jul 2021 12:47:40 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:49494) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1m5WQY-0002F3-3g; Mon, 19 Jul 2021 12:47:34 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:1728 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1m5WQX-0007zR-O8; Mon, 19 Jul 2021 12:47:34 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87a6mijmrb.fsf@gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Mon, 19 Jul 2021 18:23:36 +0200) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:210294 Archived-At: > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Cc: dick , 49160@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2021 18:23:36 +0200 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > More to the point: since this attribute of a buffer cannot be changed > > once the buffer is created, I think it might be okay to copy from the > > base buffer, but we should also allow the caller to control that by > > introducing an optional argument similar to that of get-buffer-create. > > And if we do that, we could also consider making the default value be > > nil, not necessarily a copy of that of the base buffer. > > I've now applied Dick's patch, and then adjusted as you suggest. Thanks.