From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#61726: [PATCH] Eglot: Support positionEncoding capability Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2023 19:02:08 +0200 Message-ID: <83ttzbm1yn.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87a614g628.fsf@gmail.com> <875ybsfvtj.fsf@gmail.com> <831qmgr17p.fsf@gnu.org> <87wn48ecdz.fsf@gmail.com> <83v8jspgnr.fsf@gnu.org> <87lekodxja.fsf@gmail.com> <83a614p4sh.fsf@gnu.org> <87cz60dus9.fsf@gmail.com> <835ybrpnqj.fsf@gnu.org> <87y1oncz09.fsf@gmail.com> <83r0ufo3uc.fsf@gnu.org> <87356vbf0b.fsf@gmail.com> <83pm9znw0i.fsf@gnu.org> <87lekn9ss3.fsf@gmail.com> <83h6vbntqd.fsf@gnu.org> <878rgn9r6u.fsf@gmail.com> <83edqfnq5u.fsf@gnu.org> <87zg93866h.fsf@gmail.com> <83356vnl3m.fsf@gnu.org> <87r0uf83au.fsf@gmail.com> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="12556"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 61726@debbugs.gnu.org, joaotavora@gmail.com To: Augusto Stoffel Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 24 18:03:15 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pVbTX-00034t-3S for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 24 Feb 2023 18:03:15 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pVbTN-0002A7-Jj; Fri, 24 Feb 2023 12:03:05 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pVbTL-00025U-Rm for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Feb 2023 12:03:04 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pVbTK-0007Yr-Sk for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Feb 2023 12:03:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pVbTK-0003ss-AV for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Feb 2023 12:03:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2023 17:03:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 61726 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 61726-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B61726.167725815714891 (code B ref 61726); Fri, 24 Feb 2023 17:03:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 61726) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Feb 2023 17:02:37 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38131 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pVbSu-0003s6-VQ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 24 Feb 2023 12:02:37 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:60944) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pVbSt-0003rt-6B for 61726@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 24 Feb 2023 12:02:35 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pVbSn-0007SC-T7; Fri, 24 Feb 2023 12:02:29 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=nM6aPnpfk1xeN4HwuBQN8wEd2jeIQKcpt8BJphRxFjQ=; b=d/4yCFk37yd0 CgfS6Cw1YiBGjgL3Tj+pj4C9q1mEyXnj4Ebw0kBvV1g7Mq3dQjPQPw2x/27r5zRK963tkjkE33wfo 1kQWJZr1w/G/EgT/m6YHabugm9FJ11QRjrNMxKVIC/GR8i0MkFENBCnvnD3DKeWJ+EztX6MQuRmUi ulcdfMf7HVdoyByxBPK3MHkaEfjHpULrpVqYJLLX2+8PFdRR5G6HSW0zaBQ8+Re4s0DwkB+wUJ/lR L7fCPJT0WyMBbYkizDWf6csDZ7Gk8Z56KnV4u0zZElAeG0YuGN9K056tjQm7O3Gce1sOrlvzh9YdN GL0IFEAFw5BYVR4vmEFbrw==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pVbSU-0008Vi-O6; Fri, 24 Feb 2023 12:02:29 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87r0uf83au.fsf@gmail.com> (message from Augusto Stoffel on Fri, 24 Feb 2023 16:56:57 +0100) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:256638 Archived-At: > From: Augusto Stoffel > Cc: joaotavora@gmail.com, 61726@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2023 16:56:57 +0100 > > On Fri, 24 Feb 2023 at 17:23, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > It is not more expensive. The underlying functions we call are > > already capable of producing replacements instead of characters that > > cannot be encoded in UTF-8. We just don't use those capabilities in > > json.c because some of us had strong feelings about signaling an error > > in these situations. > > I didn't track down byte-to-position and position-bytes in the C code. > So you are saying they're as expensive as encode-coding-string? If (and > only if) this is the case, then I take back my point :-). I didn't mean those functions, I meant the functions used by json.c to encode strings.