From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#66922: 29.1; No redisplay of buffer, even after using `force-window-update' Date: Sat, 04 Nov 2023 13:17:43 +0200 Message-ID: <83ttq14vjc.fsf@gnu.org> References: <8334xm7jsm.fsf@gnu.org> <83r0l656ui.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="38788"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 66922-done@debbugs.gnu.org To: dalanicolai Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Nov 04 12:18:55 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1qzEg3-0009sp-IW for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 04 Nov 2023 12:18:55 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qzEfi-0002t5-2U; Sat, 04 Nov 2023 07:18:34 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qzEfb-0002sj-R2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Nov 2023 07:18:28 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qzEfZ-00037d-Uh for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Nov 2023 07:18:26 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qzEgA-0004AY-0o for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Nov 2023 07:19:02 -0400 Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 04 Nov 2023 11:19:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: cc-closed 66922 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Mail-Followup-To: 66922@debbugs.gnu.org, eliz@gnu.org, dalanicolai@gmail.com Original-Received: via spool by 66922-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D66922.169909671515983 (code D ref 66922); Sat, 04 Nov 2023 11:19:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 66922-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Nov 2023 11:18:35 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33011 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qzEfj-00049j-2H for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 04 Nov 2023 07:18:35 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:34110) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qzEfi-00049X-AY for 66922-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 04 Nov 2023 07:18:34 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qzEf1-00034r-44; Sat, 04 Nov 2023 07:17:52 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=PVUz8F8MAJ54kXPI8kVdzuBs4oX+rXgIL0Pc2WbhzTM=; b=CXCPtiGAXP6q X0o2NMn8vAN3IDllAYtyYKeF2RU+3zbZ3NTPAsPRF9f87NOwf1zXhXBM1NwxSrXoFZPWJVyb9jRId /8oQJwb50JK3iebMiZ9OpuLn1sXKaDxv8HOqgEXW7xDY+jMe2nQadKth7vl/CY2G8RILxk0/mwgsE YMVDPPkhHGqTvtXjV0xTvKskRSUAdJBFIeNymPSI+tfzxeG4Oi0oCoZft5dNlnFF7Lt8v5ZNLPzc7 WF1+B44I+zR2bNvSxqWZDABJVGINqvJaYOqIHqh0N07X+akSMxEwy+wecgTpDlgWk8TSstKE4f8fS LIDGG7HWlLBdV91xacQGUw==; In-Reply-To: (message from dalanicolai on Sat, 4 Nov 2023 12:07:49 +0100) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:273775 Archived-At: > From: dalanicolai > Date: Sat, 4 Nov 2023 12:07:49 +0100 > Cc: 66922@debbugs.gnu.org > > Thank you for looking again at it Eli, > > in the recipe, I am printing the buffer-name and the window-start > together (where the buffer-name gets evaluated before window-start), > and it says that the buffer-name is 'example'. So I expected > (window-start) to return the window-start from the window displaying > the example buffer. > > I already wanted to write you that this must be the case, but I > thought let me first try to print the buffer of the selected-window. > In that case, indeed, it shows that the selected-window is that of the > warning buffer. > > Finally, I understand now that the current-buffer is not per se the same > as the buffer displayed in the selected window. I understand it now, but > until now that was not obvious to me. > > Thanks again Eli, for clearing things up! I'm glad I could be of help. I'm therefore closing this bug.