From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#16244: 24.3.50; eww does not show SVG images in HTML files Date: Wed, 25 Dec 2013 05:49:06 +0200 Message-ID: <83sith6159.fsf@gnu.org> References: <8361qe6s7p.fsf@gnu.org> <871u12rod9.fsf@building.gnus.org> <83vbye55mn.fsf@gnu.org> <87ha9yq7tr.fsf@building.gnus.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1387943413 8471 80.91.229.3 (25 Dec 2013 03:50:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 25 Dec 2013 03:50:13 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 16244@debbugs.gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Dec 25 04:50:17 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VvfU9-0003TF-BJ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 25 Dec 2013 04:50:17 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41099 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VvfU9-0006ml-15 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 24 Dec 2013 22:50:17 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43779) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VvfU0-0006ld-Mc for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Dec 2013 22:50:14 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VvfTu-0004H0-Vy for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Dec 2013 22:50:08 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:54371) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VvfTu-0004Gb-RI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Dec 2013 22:50:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VvfTu-0002D9-0j for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Dec 2013 22:50:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 25 Dec 2013 03:50:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 16244 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 16244-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B16244.13879433568402 (code B ref 16244); Wed, 25 Dec 2013 03:50:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 16244) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Dec 2013 03:49:16 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40157 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VvfT9-0002BS-Qx for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 24 Dec 2013 22:49:16 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout23.012.net.il ([80.179.55.175]:45655) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VvfT3-0002BF-VS for 16244@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 24 Dec 2013 22:49:14 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout23.012.net.il by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MYC00E00FPQ8P00@a-mtaout23.012.net.il> for 16244@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 25 Dec 2013 05:49:08 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MYC00E8MFXW7250@a-mtaout23.012.net.il>; Wed, 25 Dec 2013 05:49:08 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <87ha9yq7tr.fsf@building.gnus.org> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:82560 Archived-At: > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Cc: 16244@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2013 22:04:32 +0100 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > >> but is this a bug fix or a new feature? >"? If it's a bug, I can > >> whip up a fix... > > > > Well, this is a bug report, no? > > Are you saying that all missing features are bugs? >"? I'm saying that if one image is displayed while another isn't, it's a bug.