From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Ken Brown <kbrown@cornell.edu>
Cc: 17510@debbugs.gnu.org, dmantipov@yandex.ru
Subject: bug#17510: 24.3.91; Problem with `emacs --daemon' in cygw32 build
Date: Sat, 24 May 2014 15:59:07 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <83sinzjpt0.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <538092B6.9000807@cornell.edu>
> Date: Sat, 24 May 2014 08:38:14 -0400
> From: Ken Brown <kbrown@cornell.edu>
> CC: 17510@debbugs.gnu.org, dmantipov@yandex.ru
>
> My guess as to the cause of this bug was completely wrong. What happens
> in my recipe is that the pointer dpyinfo->w32_id_name is freed twice.
> (This is done in x_delete_display each time the only existing client
> frame is deleted.) An attempt to create a client frame for the third
> time then leads to a crash because of malloc corruption.
>
> I have no idea why this problem only showed up after Dmitry's code
> cleanup. The only thing I can think of is that maintaining a list of
> display names, with insertions and deletions, masked the malloc corruption.
>
> I think the right fix here would be to really delete the display when
> x_delete_display is called, free all resources, and set things up so
> that everything will be re-initialized if a new frame is created. But
> this seems like a lot of trouble, possibly with unintended consequences.
> The following is a much simpler workaround:
>
> === modified file 'src/w32term.c'
> --- src/w32term.c 2014-04-16 14:00:39 +0000
> +++ src/w32term.c 2014-05-24 12:13:15 +0000
> @@ -6426,7 +6426,9 @@
> if (dpyinfo->palette)
> DeleteObject (dpyinfo->palette);
> }
> +#ifndef CYGWIN
> xfree (dpyinfo->w32_id_name);
> +#endif
>
> w32_reset_fringes ();
> }
>
> I would of course add a comment explaining this. What do you think?
This looks OK to me, but I wonder: is it really correct not to free
w32_id_name at all? And if that is correct, why only on Cygwin?
Does the Cygwin-w32 build also use a single dpyinfo object, like the
native Windows build? If so, perhaps we need not free this in both
these builds. IOW, I think your suggested change is OK for the
emacs-24 branch, but on the trunk I'd suggest to remove the xfree line
altogether.
Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-24 12:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-16 17:50 bug#17510: 24.3.91; Problem with `emacs --daemon' in cygw32 build Ken Brown
2014-05-16 20:06 ` Ken Brown
2014-05-17 23:39 ` Ken Brown
2014-05-18 4:32 ` Eli Zaretskii
2014-05-18 14:30 ` Ken Brown
2014-05-18 15:11 ` Eli Zaretskii
2014-05-18 19:36 ` Ken Brown
2014-05-19 12:03 ` Ken Brown
2014-05-19 16:46 ` Eli Zaretskii
2014-05-19 17:31 ` Eli Zaretskii
2014-05-19 19:25 ` Ken Brown
2014-05-24 12:38 ` Ken Brown
2014-05-24 12:59 ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2014-05-24 18:14 ` Ken Brown
2014-05-24 22:18 ` Ken Brown
2014-05-24 19:28 ` Daniel Colascione
2014-05-24 22:18 ` Ken Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=83sinzjpt0.fsf@gnu.org \
--to=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=17510@debbugs.gnu.org \
--cc=dmantipov@yandex.ru \
--cc=kbrown@cornell.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).