From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#18143: Vertical scroll bar does not work with Image files Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2014 15:29:09 +0300 Message-ID: <83silkfiwa.fsf@gnu.org> References: <53D77DDA.7030406@alice.it> <83vbqgfk40.fsf@gnu.org> <53D78FE7.7040603@alice.it> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1406637065 9675 80.91.229.3 (29 Jul 2014 12:31:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2014 12:31:05 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 18143@debbugs.gnu.org To: Angelo Graziosi Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jul 29 14:30:57 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XC6YM-0003yl-Tk for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 29 Jul 2014 14:30:51 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45291 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XC6YM-0001p1-6K for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 29 Jul 2014 08:30:50 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38284) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XC6Xh-0000vU-3Z for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Jul 2014 08:30:14 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XC6Xb-0006dx-PM for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Jul 2014 08:30:09 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:46483) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XC6Xb-0006dL-NO for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Jul 2014 08:30:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XC6Xa-00084N-Bo for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Jul 2014 08:30:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2014 12:30:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 18143 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 18143-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B18143.140663694530925 (code B ref 18143); Tue, 29 Jul 2014 12:30:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 18143) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Jul 2014 12:29:05 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41749 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XC6We-00082j-QP for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 29 Jul 2014 08:29:05 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout24.012.net.il ([80.179.55.180]:55770) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XC6Wc-00082D-08 for 18143@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 29 Jul 2014 08:29:02 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout24.012.net.il by mtaout24.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0N9H006003MA6X00@mtaout24.012.net.il> for 18143@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 29 Jul 2014 15:24:46 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by mtaout24.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0N9H00NF73T7VM80@mtaout24.012.net.il>; Tue, 29 Jul 2014 15:24:46 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: <53D78FE7.7040603@alice.it> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:91935 Archived-At: > Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2014 14:13:27 +0200 > From: Angelo Graziosi > CC: 18143@debbugs.gnu.org > > > What you see is due to the difference between the 2 scroll bars in how > > the size of the scroll-bar thumb is computed: in character units for > > the vertical scroll bar vs pixel units for the horizontal scroll bar. > > But is this a bug? No, it's a direct consequence of how the thumb size calculation was designed to work. > I would convert also the vertical scroll bar to pixel unit. Please suggest a method of doing that. I thought about that, and concluded that it wasn't trivial. I'd be happy to learn what I missed.