From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#16737: Timed out waiting for reply from selection owner Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2015 16:56:45 +0200 Message-ID: <83sif9zc9e.fsf@gnu.org> References: <21244.16071.147204.408385@gargle.gargle.HOWL> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1421506631 31428 80.91.229.3 (17 Jan 2015 14:57:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2015 14:57:11 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 16737@debbugs.gnu.org To: Oleh Krehel Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jan 17 15:57:11 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YCUoI-0005wG-NX for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 15:57:10 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59423 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YCUoH-0003pU-Jv for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 09:57:09 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39873) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YCUoE-0003pD-Ea for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 09:57:07 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YCUoB-0006W9-21 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 09:57:06 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:51472) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YCUoA-0006W0-Vx for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 09:57:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YCUoA-00044U-7O for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 09:57:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2015 14:57:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 16737 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo Original-Received: via spool by 16737-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B16737.142150662115644 (code B ref 16737); Sat, 17 Jan 2015 14:57:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 16737) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Jan 2015 14:57:01 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60333 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YCUo8-00044G-Ux for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 09:57:01 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout23.012.net.il ([80.179.55.175]:46406) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YCUo4-000444-DW for 16737@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 09:56:57 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout23.012.net.il by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NIB00900SKWHG00@a-mtaout23.012.net.il> for 16737@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 16:56:49 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NIB009F8TIP8740@a-mtaout23.012.net.il>; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 16:56:49 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:98442 Archived-At: > Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2015 15:38:11 +0100 > From: Oleh Krehel > > I just wanted to add that this bug is still active and affects me. > > I know some basics of GDB, so if someone could direct me to a tutorial > that's good enough to produce a meaningful backtrace, I'd be glad to > add more information to this bug, since I can reproduce it usually > once per day. First, please establish that you see the same problem, e.g. by obtaining backtraces as described earlier in this discussion. Then there was a patch Jan posted that might give some information. Thanks.