From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Dmitry Gutov <dgutov@yandex.ru>
Cc: esr@snark.thyrsus.com, 20292@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#20292: 24.5; Saving Git-controlled file with merge conflicts after "stash pop" stages the file
Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2015 20:06:14 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <83sibw59q1.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5533D7B8.7060508@yandex.ru>
> Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2015 19:28:40 +0300
> From: Dmitry Gutov <dgutov@yandex.ru>
> CC: esr@snark.thyrsus.com, 20292@debbugs.gnu.org
>
> On 04/19/2015 05:30 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>
> > I suggested one method below; perhaps there are others, I simply don't
> > know enough about Git.
>
> Apparently, we misunderstand each other. By "this case", do you mean
> when merging a stash in general?
I meant when "git stash pop" reports conflicts, in particular after a
"git pull" or "git merge".
> Because I've described a more specific case (popping a stash when one
> has staged changes in one of the involved files), and it looked like you
> were referring to it in >>best not to run "git add" in the first place<<.
I think we were talking about the same use case, but I cannot be sure,
since "has staged changes" might me more general than what I had in
mind.
> > Stashed changes were uncommitted before, so they should stay
> > uncommitted after, I think. Having them staged means the situation
> > after "stash pop" is different than it was before "stash save", which
> > I think is not what the user expects.
>
> Right. And I meant the difference between what we do depending on
> whether user has something staged originally.
Before "git stash save"? The case I had in mind didn't have anything
staged before that.
> > If you are questioning the wisdom of doing "stash drop", then this
> > question is not for me: it wasn't my suggestion.
>
> You said "yes".
Yes, because someone more knowledgeable than myself said it was a good
idea.
> I asked about this in the context of consistency; the question was
> about how far will we go to be consistent with Bzr, and whether it's
> feasible to do so, or we should stop at some point.
I think it's okay to leave the stash and not drop it in this case.
> > If we are not sure
> > dropping the stash automatically is what the user wants, let's not
> > drop it, and leave management of stashes to the user. It's not a big
> > deal to leave the stash behind, I think.
>
> It's not that big a deal to leave marking files as resolved to the user
> either. Am I right to understand that's what you're currently
> suggesting, at least when dealing with stashes?
What does it mean to "mark files as resolved" when the conflict comes
from stashed changes that were uncommitted before "stash save"?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-04-19 17:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 68+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-10 12:55 bug#20292: 24.5; Saving Git-controlled file with merge conflicts after "stash pop" stages the file Eli Zaretskii
2015-04-18 19:16 ` Dmitry Gutov
2015-04-18 19:31 ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-04-18 21:58 ` Dmitry Gutov
2015-04-18 22:06 ` Dmitry Gutov
2015-04-19 14:30 ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-04-19 16:28 ` Dmitry Gutov
2015-04-19 17:06 ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2015-04-19 17:38 ` Dmitry Gutov
2015-04-19 18:05 ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-04-19 18:11 ` Dmitry Gutov
2015-04-19 18:25 ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-04-19 18:30 ` Dmitry Gutov
2015-04-19 18:38 ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-04-19 19:27 ` Dmitry Gutov
2015-04-19 19:33 ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-04-20 2:41 ` Stefan Monnier
2015-04-20 14:45 ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-04-20 19:20 ` Stefan Monnier
2015-04-20 19:23 ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-04-21 1:06 ` Stefan Monnier
2015-04-22 1:50 ` Dmitry Gutov
2015-04-22 7:35 ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-05-12 23:13 ` Dmitry Gutov
2015-05-13 13:04 ` Stefan Monnier
2015-05-13 16:20 ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-05-13 16:18 ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-05-14 1:24 ` Dmitry Gutov
2015-05-14 14:53 ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-05-14 18:00 ` Dmitry Gutov
2015-05-14 18:49 ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-05-14 3:49 ` Stefan Monnier
2015-05-14 14:53 ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-05-14 15:51 ` Stefan Monnier
2015-05-14 17:30 ` Dmitry Gutov
2015-05-14 18:36 ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-05-14 18:48 ` Dmitry Gutov
2015-05-14 18:52 ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-05-14 19:09 ` Dmitry Gutov
2015-05-14 19:33 ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-05-14 20:24 ` Dmitry Gutov
2015-05-14 20:55 ` Stefan Monnier
2015-05-15 7:14 ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-05-15 18:13 ` Stefan Monnier
2015-05-15 18:55 ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-05-15 20:02 ` Stefan Monnier
2015-05-15 20:19 ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-05-15 23:52 ` Stefan Monnier
2015-05-15 23:57 ` Dmitry Gutov
2015-05-16 13:48 ` Stefan Monnier
2015-05-15 23:50 ` Dmitry Gutov
2015-05-16 7:15 ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-05-16 8:03 ` Dmitry Gutov
2015-05-16 8:55 ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-05-16 13:15 ` Dmitry Gutov
2015-05-16 13:53 ` Stefan Monnier
2015-05-16 14:13 ` Dmitry Gutov
2015-05-15 7:10 ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-05-15 7:17 ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-04-22 8:47 ` Richard Stallman
2015-04-22 9:16 ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-04-22 19:59 ` Richard Stallman
2015-04-22 21:32 ` Eli Zaretskii
[not found] <xmqqd1il7lor.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>
2016-11-16 0:25 ` Dmitry Gutov
2016-11-16 17:30 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-11-16 22:45 ` Dmitry Gutov
2016-11-17 15:57 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-11-17 18:04 ` Dmitry Gutov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=83sibw59q1.fsf@gnu.org \
--to=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=20292@debbugs.gnu.org \
--cc=dgutov@yandex.ru \
--cc=esr@snark.thyrsus.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).