From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#20404: 25.0.50; Sometimes no fontification with jit-lock-defer-time Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 22:52:08 +0300 Message-ID: <83sibqzkpj.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87a8y0iji1.fsf@gnu.org> <20150422163110.68601.qmail@mail.muc.de> <87383rhqky.fsf@gnu.org> <83egnb3l2f.fsf@gnu.org> <877ft3cwf6.fsf@gnu.org> <83618n2vxu.fsf@gnu.org> <83h9s6282n.fsf@gnu.org> <83383q21vl.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1429818810 28432 80.91.229.3 (23 Apr 2015 19:53:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 19:53:30 +0000 (UTC) Cc: acm@muc.de, 20404@debbugs.gnu.org, tsdh@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Apr 23 21:53:19 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YlNBO-0000Wv-A2 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 21:53:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41823 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YlNBN-0006H0-Mr for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 15:53:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50583) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YlNBJ-0006Gg-4W for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 15:53:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YlNBF-0008Sz-UM for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 15:53:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:48267) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YlNBF-0008Sv-Qg for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 15:53:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YlNBF-0004qF-K8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 15:53:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 19:53:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 20404 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 20404-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B20404.142981873718561 (code B ref 20404); Thu, 23 Apr 2015 19:53:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 20404) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Apr 2015 19:52:17 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38043 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YlNAW-0004pI-CJ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 15:52:16 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout26.012.net.il ([80.179.55.182]:36320) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YlNAT-0004p3-Tr for 20404@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 15:52:15 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout26.012.net.il by mtaout26.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NN900D00Z8RS900@mtaout26.012.net.il> for 20404@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 22:53:41 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by mtaout26.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NN900AIJZ9H5O30@mtaout26.012.net.il>; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 22:53:41 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:101950 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Monnier > Cc: tsdh@gnu.org, acm@muc.de, 20404@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 15:31:56 -0400 > > > I don't see how what you say can follow from what I wrote in that message. > > I just misunderstood. > > > But that doesn't mean input-pending-p will return nil when there's > > input unread by read_socket_hook, because once our keyboard queue gets > > emptied, readable_events will return zero, and then we _will_ call > > read_socket_hook to fill our queue, and then the second call to > > readable_events will return non-zero, and input-pending-p will return > > non-nil. > > Good. But then I don't understand why Tassilo gets the same display > freezes with jit-lock-defer-time set to 0 as when jit-lock-defer-time is > set to nil. Neither do I. I see a very big difference: with jit-lock-defer-time set to zero, the freezes are minor and almost non-existent. With it set to nil, they are much more evident and much longer. > You seem to say that you know why (and that you explained it in those > old discussions), but I guess I don't understand those explanations. I never said the value of zero should have no effect, nor do I thing it should, or does.