From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#25671: Feature request: emacs -Q --script as a single binary Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 18:58:29 +0200 Message-ID: <83shnm2dai.fsf@gnu.org> References: <4d463814-5439-da70-d3af-b9e603121f8a@live.com> <83lgte4hto.fsf@gnu.org> <372ac0e0-a3d1-70ba-efe0-2e1519088c57@live.com> <831sv63x8b.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1486745951 8614 195.159.176.226 (10 Feb 2017 16:59:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 16:59:11 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 25671@debbugs.gnu.org To: =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Pit--Claudel Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 10 17:59:08 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ccEXL-0001x3-TR for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 17:59:08 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44820 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ccEXP-0004cT-Vp for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 11:59:12 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58527) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ccEXK-0004bI-HQ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 11:59:07 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ccEXG-0005Go-53 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 11:59:06 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:36742) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ccEXG-0005Gi-1Q for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 11:59:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ccEXF-0006iG-Qh for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 11:59:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 16:59:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 25671 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 25671-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B25671.148674591325765 (code B ref 25671); Fri, 10 Feb 2017 16:59:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 25671) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Feb 2017 16:58:33 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34941 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ccEWm-0006hU-U8 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 11:58:33 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:39190) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ccEWk-0006hH-TJ for 25671@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 11:58:31 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ccEWb-0004zV-72 for 25671@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 11:58:25 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:47995) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ccEWb-0004zR-3T; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 11:58:21 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:1031 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1ccEWa-0002W6-K2; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 11:58:20 -0500 In-reply-to: (message from =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Pit--Claudel on Fri, 10 Feb 2017 11:45:55 -0500) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:129210 Archived-At: > Cc: 25671@debbugs.gnu.org > From: Clément Pit--Claudel > Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 11:45:55 -0500 > > >>> I believe changing the program behavior depending on how it was named > >>> in the command that invoked it is against GNU coding standards. > >> > >> What about providing elisp or emacs-script as a separate binary? > > > > What about it? > > Would that be OK? Could it work? Yes, it will. Although distributing two large binaries might be overkill. (All that just to make shell scripts slightly simpler?)