From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#26126: 26.0.50; file-notify-rm-watch removes arbitrary watches Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 22:02:56 +0200 Message-ID: <83shm55bbj.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87r31x9ulw.fsf@luca> <87shmcney8.fsf@detlef> <87efxw7xvc.fsf@luca> <87mvcjophx.fsf@detlef> <87tw6rssoi.fsf@luca> <87pohfkmvh.fsf@detlef> <87lgs2sobr.fsf@luca> <87y3w2gywc.fsf@detlef> <8737e8excq.fsf@luca> <87bmsuixuj.fsf@detlef> <87efxqmzyp.fsf@luca> <877f3h4fjd.fsf@detlef> <87shm5ky0q.fsf@luca> <87lgrx2l89.fsf@detlef> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1490213055 3884 195.159.176.226 (22 Mar 2017 20:04:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 20:04:15 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 26126@debbugs.gnu.org, politza@hochschule-trier.de To: Michael Albinus Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 22 21:04:11 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cqmUH-0008Jm-AC for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 21:04:05 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53116 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cqmUN-00030l-H2 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 16:04:11 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38368) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cqmUH-00030e-83 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 16:04:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cqmUE-0003g0-5e for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 16:04:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:41574) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cqmUE-0003fv-2s for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 16:04:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cqmUD-0001rF-Ru for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 16:04:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 20:04:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 26126 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 26126-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B26126.14902130047098 (code B ref 26126); Wed, 22 Mar 2017 20:04:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 26126) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Mar 2017 20:03:24 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39773 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cqmTc-0001qP-B6 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 16:03:24 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:47222) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cqmTb-0001qF-NQ for 26126@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 16:03:23 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cqmTT-0003Ut-3H for 26126@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 16:03:18 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:50494) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cqmTT-0003Up-0y; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 16:03:15 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:1547 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1cqmTQ-0005bi-8G; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 16:03:14 -0400 In-reply-to: <87lgrx2l89.fsf@detlef> (message from Michael Albinus on Wed, 22 Mar 2017 19:57:10 +0100) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:130823 Archived-At: > From: Michael Albinus > Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 19:57:10 +0100 > Cc: 26126@debbugs.gnu.org > > > This touches the question whether we're operating under the assumption, > > that other Lisp-code (apart from filenotify.el) may freely call > > inotify-add-watch or not. Because if it does, this has to be handled in > > inotify.c. Otherwise we may handle it in filenotify.el . > > It is still possible to call inotify-add-watch and companions. However, > we don't force this use; the Elisp manual decribes only filenoty.el > functionality. IMO, Lisp programs should always go through filenotify.el, never via backend-specific APIs.