From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#34749: 26.1; `delete-windows-on': (1) doc, (2) bug, (3) bug, (4) candidates Date: Sat, 09 Mar 2019 20:12:02 +0200 Message-ID: <83sgvv7w99.fsf@gnu.org> References: <> <<5C7E4BAB.3050508@gmx.at>> <<83mum5accd.fsf@gnu.org>> <<5C824BAC.4090907@gmx.at>> <<83lg1pa4oa.fsf@gnu.org>> <<5C82B9E1.1080302@gmx.at>> <<83zhq587g6.fsf@gnu.org>> <<5C837BD6.9010200@gmx.at>> <<83ef7g8gbc.fsf@gnu.org>> <<5C83BC9B.5020803@gmx.at>> <> <<8336nw807g.fsf@gnu.org>> Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="16402"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: 34749@debbugs.gnu.org To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Mar 09 19:13:13 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1h2gTA-0004Bi-OS for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 09 Mar 2019 19:13:12 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33867 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h2gT9-0008Tm-Jn for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 09 Mar 2019 13:13:11 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:52412) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h2gT1-0008Rg-F7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Mar 2019 13:13:06 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h2gT0-0007Rf-O6 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Mar 2019 13:13:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:52062) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h2gT0-0007RT-K0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Mar 2019 13:13:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1h2gT0-0003KP-A5 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Mar 2019 13:13:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 09 Mar 2019 18:13:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 34749 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 34749-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B34749.155215517412775 (code B ref 34749); Sat, 09 Mar 2019 18:13:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 34749) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Mar 2019 18:12:54 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37373 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1h2gSr-0003Jz-Se for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 09 Mar 2019 13:12:54 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:37977) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1h2gSq-0003Jl-9e for 34749@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 09 Mar 2019 13:12:52 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:33682) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h2gSk-0007Hn-OR; Sat, 09 Mar 2019 13:12:46 -0500 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=4966 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1h2gSf-0006OU-2J; Sat, 09 Mar 2019 13:12:44 -0500 In-reply-to: (message from Drew Adams on Sat, 9 Mar 2019 09:35:24 -0800 (PST)) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:156196 Archived-At: > Date: Sat, 9 Mar 2019 09:35:24 -0800 (PST) > From: Drew Adams > Cc: rudalics@gmx.at, 34749@debbugs.gnu.org > > > > I wonder if it would help to give an example where > > > we show correspondence between a spec that uses a > > > string argument to `interactive' that specifies a > > > few args to the function, of different types, and > > > a spec that uses a Lisp sexp, which when evaluated > > > produces a list of those same args. > > > > There's an example right after that text. > > I don't see an example that shows the correspondence > between a string arg and a Lisp sexp arg that returns > a list of args. Why is it important what types are the arguments? The issue was the significance of the newline in the interactive spec string, and that is independent of the types of the arguments.