From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#35044: 25.2; Description of "disappearing" faces (Emacs Manual) Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2019 09:23:18 +0300 Message-ID: <83sgudb3ft.fsf@gnu.org> References: <875zr9vf90.fsf@gmail.com> Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="27613"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: mrsebastianurban@gmail.com, 35044@debbugs.gnu.org To: Noam Postavsky Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Apr 20 08:33:20 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hHjYt-00074Z-S2 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 20 Apr 2019 08:33:19 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37594 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hHjYs-0007oB-RH for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 20 Apr 2019 02:33:18 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:56269) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hHjXf-0006tx-EU for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Apr 2019 02:32:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hHjPu-0003m6-B4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Apr 2019 02:24:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:60016) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hHjPu-0003ls-7Q for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Apr 2019 02:24:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hHjPu-00068X-1U for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Apr 2019 02:24:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2019 06:24:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 35044 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 35044-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B35044.155574142023562 (code B ref 35044); Sat, 20 Apr 2019 06:24:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 35044) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Apr 2019 06:23:40 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45327 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hHjPX-00067x-Oo for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 20 Apr 2019 02:23:40 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:41068) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hHjPW-00067j-DG for 35044@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 20 Apr 2019 02:23:38 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:55857) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hHjPR-0003fb-9y; Sat, 20 Apr 2019 02:23:33 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=3893 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1hHjPQ-0004bt-MU; Sat, 20 Apr 2019 02:23:33 -0400 In-reply-to: <875zr9vf90.fsf@gmail.com> (message from Noam Postavsky on Fri, 19 Apr 2019 17:47:55 -0400) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:157885 Archived-At: > From: Noam Postavsky > Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2019 17:47:55 -0400 > Cc: 35044@debbugs.gnu.org > > So I've been looking at this, and I think maybe the only manual change > needed is in the Elisp manual to more strongly recommend using > font-lock-face for this sort of thing: LGTM, thanks.