From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#34789: Scan of regexp mistakes Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2019 15:48:48 +0300 Message-ID: <83sgsdzm4v.fsf@gnu.org> References: Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="238805"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: herring@lanl.gov, 34789@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Kangas Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jun 13 16:16:08 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hbQWI-000ziz-Ka for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 13 Jun 2019 16:16:02 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40248 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hbQWC-00023W-7h for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 13 Jun 2019 10:15:56 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:41657) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hbPB5-00053g-Jx for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Jun 2019 08:50:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hbPB4-0007kb-KL for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Jun 2019 08:50:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:49399) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hbPB4-0007kD-Db for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Jun 2019 08:50:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hbPB4-00026H-8k for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Jun 2019 08:50:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2019 12:50:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 34789 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 34789-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B34789.15604301548006 (code B ref 34789); Thu, 13 Jun 2019 12:50:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 34789) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Jun 2019 12:49:14 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34710 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hbPAH-000254-SP for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 13 Jun 2019 08:49:14 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:60892) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hbPAF-00024r-MN for 34789@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 13 Jun 2019 08:49:12 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:59822) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hbPA2-0006tb-S0; Thu, 13 Jun 2019 08:49:01 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=2488 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1hbP9q-0000uq-Vz; Thu, 13 Jun 2019 08:48:52 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Stefan Kangas on Thu, 13 Jun 2019 14:13:45 +0200) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:160494 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Kangas > Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2019 14:13:45 +0200 > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , Davis Herring > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > Thanks, it does. I think we indeed should move this package into > > obsolete/. > > Does this patch do the job? Works for me, but I'm not sure we have the procedure for obsoleting a package documented anywhere, so maybe something else needs to be done. Anyone?