From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#36225: 26.2.90; Can't build master Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2019 19:51:05 +0300 Message-ID: <83sgsavll2.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83tvcqvmw7.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="188673"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: 36225@debbugs.gnu.org To: Philipp Stephani Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jun 15 18:52:13 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hcBuW-000mwO-T4 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 15 Jun 2019 18:52:13 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33572 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hcBuV-00070g-Jo for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 15 Jun 2019 12:52:11 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:49909) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hcBuO-00070M-Ew for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Jun 2019 12:52:05 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hcBuM-0005SW-Di for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Jun 2019 12:52:04 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:53826) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hcBuM-0005Rt-5X for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Jun 2019 12:52:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hcBuL-00058A-Us for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Jun 2019 12:52:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2019 16:52:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 36225 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 36225-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B36225.156061747019639 (code B ref 36225); Sat, 15 Jun 2019 16:52:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 36225) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Jun 2019 16:51:10 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39137 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hcBtW-00056h-4D for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 15 Jun 2019 12:51:10 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:40949) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hcBtT-00056P-A4 for 36225@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 15 Jun 2019 12:51:08 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:39535) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hcBtO-0004XT-3w; Sat, 15 Jun 2019 12:51:02 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=3363 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1hcBtL-0000wF-7W; Sat, 15 Jun 2019 12:51:00 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Philipp Stephani on Sat, 15 Jun 2019 18:34:32 +0200) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:160623 Archived-At: > From: Philipp Stephani > Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2019 18:34:32 +0200 > Cc: 36225@debbugs.gnu.org > > > The comment to CHECK_STRUCTS in src/config.h tells you what to do in > > this case. > > Yes, it says "If you change one of these structures, check that the > pdumper.c code is still valid", but since I didn't change the > structure, I can't decide whether the pdumper code is still valid. > Whoever changed the definition of Lisp_Buffer_Objfwd should make that > call. It says to update the pertinent hash in pdumper.c by manually copying the hash from dmpstruct.h. The hash to be updated is called out by the error message. So I think the information you need is there to fix your build.