From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#40968: 28.0.50; (apply nil) Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2020 19:36:52 +0300 Message-ID: <83sgfdctln.fsf@gnu.org> References: <874kssm04d.fsf@gmail.com> <6ADF0807-7EBD-4054-8579-4D9AD3065D51@acm.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="13679"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: mattiase@acm.org, stefan@marxist.se, 40968@debbugs.gnu.org, npostavs@gmail.com To: Pip Cet Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Jun 02 18:38:08 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jg9vU-0003U0-Gm for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 02 Jun 2020 18:38:08 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41324 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jg9vT-0007iI-Jp for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 02 Jun 2020 12:38:07 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:36642) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jg9vO-0007i6-2B for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Jun 2020 12:38:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:57468) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jg9vN-0001sR-PF for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Jun 2020 12:38:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jg9vN-0001nl-ND for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Jun 2020 12:38:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2020 16:38:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 40968 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 40968-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B40968.15911158396868 (code B ref 40968); Tue, 02 Jun 2020 16:38:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 40968) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Jun 2020 16:37:19 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40781 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jg9uh-0001mh-K5 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 02 Jun 2020 12:37:19 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:57378) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jg9ud-0001mQ-Pb for 40968@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 02 Jun 2020 12:37:19 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:47966) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jg9uY-0001pQ-7K; Tue, 02 Jun 2020 12:37:10 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=1699 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1jg9uX-00017j-Ex; Tue, 02 Jun 2020 12:37:10 -0400 In-Reply-To: (message from Pip Cet on Tue, 2 Jun 2020 07:36:26 +0000) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:181414 Archived-At: > From: Pip Cet > Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2020 07:36:26 +0000 > Cc: Noam Postavsky , Stefan Kangas , Eli Zaretskii , > 40968@debbugs.gnu.org > > +@code{apply} with a single argument is special: the first element of > +the argument, which must be a non-empty list, is called as a function > +with the remaining elements as individual arguments. Passing two or > +more arguments will be faster. This is okay, but I think the last sentence could be more explicit if reworded like this: However, we recommend always passing 2 or more arguments, as the function works faster in that case. Thanks.