From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#43615: 26.3; eshell: face for directory and symlink the same in terminal Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2020 12:58:39 +0300 Message-ID: <83sgb4rh9s.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83ft75ss47.fsf@gnu.org> <83eempsqn8.fsf@gnu.org> <83a6xdsp2k.fsf@gnu.org> <833635rqyx.fsf@gnu.org> <83wo0grjzg.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="24336"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 43615@debbugs.gnu.org To: ams@gnu.org (Alfred M. Szmidt) Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Sep 26 11:59:22 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kM6zC-0006EM-65 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 26 Sep 2020 11:59:22 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51928 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kM6zB-0007kV-9L for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 26 Sep 2020 05:59:21 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:48206) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kM6ys-0007ZS-K1 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Sep 2020 05:59:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:34302) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kM6ys-0004rI-AV for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Sep 2020 05:59:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kM6ys-0004rw-AA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Sep 2020 05:59:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2020 09:59:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 43615 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 43615-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B43615.160111431518671 (code B ref 43615); Sat, 26 Sep 2020 09:59:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 43615) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Sep 2020 09:58:35 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45847 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kM6yR-0004r5-9s for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 26 Sep 2020 05:58:35 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:41352) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kM6yQ-0004qq-5z for 43615@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 26 Sep 2020 05:58:34 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:58553) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kM6yK-0004qR-K9 for 43615@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 26 Sep 2020 05:58:28 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=4269 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kM6yG-000770-TT; Sat, 26 Sep 2020 05:58:25 -0400 In-Reply-To: (ams@gnu.org) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:189009 Archived-At: > From: ams@gnu.org (Alfred M. Szmidt) > CC: 43615@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2020 05:45:14 -0400 > > Plain files could just be left at the default face, no? > > Yes. > > That would leave us with directory, symlink, executable, and > backup/product/clutter, 4 colors. Maybe also add archive, which > yields 5 colors. Makes sense? > > Yes (though I don't understand why archive needs to be a different > face -- but that is a different problem too). I think it would be > useful to differentate at least "special"? We could add "special", yes, as we still have one more color. I think archives should have distinct colors because that's what I see when I run 'ls' on an 8-color terminal.