From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#46813: 27.0.91; Form `(subdirs . nil)' in .dir-locals.el does not protect subdirectories Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2021 20:19:55 +0200 Message-ID: <83sg5g8378.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87czwllih4.fsf@sebyte.me> <87a6rpiov9.fsf@gnus.org> <87pn0le90s.fsf@sebyte.me> <877dmsnwa7.fsf@gnus.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="40951"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: sdt@sebyte.me, 46813@debbugs.gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Feb 28 19:21:16 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lGQgt-000AXE-Hk for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 28 Feb 2021 19:21:15 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:32828 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lGQgs-0006eu-JG for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 28 Feb 2021 13:21:14 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:58734) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lGQgg-0006eb-FY for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 28 Feb 2021 13:21:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:35648) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lGQgg-0001Pl-8R for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 28 Feb 2021 13:21:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lGQgg-0002Rb-4i for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 28 Feb 2021 13:21:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2021 18:21:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 46813 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 46813-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B46813.16145364169306 (code B ref 46813); Sun, 28 Feb 2021 18:21:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 46813) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Feb 2021 18:20:16 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47194 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lGQfv-0002Q2-PE for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 28 Feb 2021 13:20:16 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:39472) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lGQfu-0002Pl-1H for 46813@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 28 Feb 2021 13:20:14 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:58183) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lGQfo-0000mX-8A; Sun, 28 Feb 2021 13:20:08 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:2613 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1lGQfh-0005Xi-09; Sun, 28 Feb 2021 13:20:02 -0500 In-Reply-To: <877dmsnwa7.fsf@gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Sun, 28 Feb 2021 14:42:40 +0100) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:201023 Archived-At: > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Cc: 46813@debbugs.gnu.org, Eli Zaretskii > Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2021 14:42:40 +0100 > > There were a whole bunch of different bugs in the .dir-locals.el code. > The relevant commits are 8f0a2c84, 75f6b264 and possibly 117d58ace. > > I think backporting the first two might be possible (they're tiny), but > I don't think this is actually a regression in Emacs 27 -- this stuff > didn't work in Emacs 26 either, if I remember correctly. So I think > backporting to Emacs 27 would be out of scope, since we're only fixing > regressions (and really serious bugs) in Emacs 27 at this time. > > But since the first two commits are really small and "obviously correct" > (ahem), perhaps it's a good idea to do so anyway. I have no opinion > here, perhaps Eli has one? (Added to the CCs.) I don't object to backporting those two commits to emacs-27, if you think those fixes are important to have in v27.2. Thanks.